joint-committee Mailing List Archive
By Date

New Message Most recent messages
2639 messages sorted by: [ author ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ mail a new topic ]

Starting: 12/14/00
Ending: 01/30/06

• test Andrew H. Turner (12/14/00)
• Re: Welcome! Mike Dean (12/14/00)
• URIs for primitive datatypes and facets? Dan Connolly (12/15/00)
• Re: URIs for primitive datatypes and facets? Martin Gudgin (12/15/00)
• Re: URIs for primitive datatypes and facets? Dan Connolly (12/18/00)
• Re: URIs for primitive datatypes and facets? Martin Gudgin (12/18/00)
• Joint Committee telecon today Mike Dean (12/19/00)
• Re: Joint Committee telecon today Dan Connolly (12/19/00)
• Toward concrete types [was: Joint...] Dan Connolly (12/19/00)
• daml+oil Ian Horrocks (12/19/00)
• Re: daml+oil Deborah McGuinness (12/19/00)
• Re: daml+oil Ian Horrocks (12/19/00)
• DAML+ONT URIs Mike Dean (12/20/00)
• Re: DAML+ONT URIs Dan Connolly (12/20/00)
• Re: DAML+ONT URIs Ian Horrocks (12/21/00)
• Re: DAML+ONT URIs Mike Dean (12/21/00)
• Re: DAML+ONT URIs Dan Connolly (12/21/00)
• Re: DAML+ONT URIs Ian Horrocks (12/22/00)
• daml+oil.daml Ian Horrocks (12/22/00)
• New version of walk-through available Frank van Harmelen (12/24/00)
• Avoiding exposed content in DAM+OIL Frank van Harmelen (12/25/00)
• about vs. ID Frank van Harmelen (12/25/00)
• using "undeclared" properties and classes Frank van Harmelen (12/25/00)
• Re: Avoiding exposed content in DAM+OIL Ian Horrocks (12/26/00)
• Re: using "undeclared" properties and classes Ian Horrocks (12/26/00)
• Re: about vs. ID Ian Horrocks (12/26/00)
• Re: New version of walk-through available Ian Horrocks (12/26/00)
• Re: Avoiding exposed content in DAM+OIL Frank van Harmelen (12/27/00)
• Re: Avoiding exposed content in DAM+OIL Stefan Decker (12/27/00)
• Re: New version of walk-through available Frank van Harmelen (12/27/00)
• Re: Avoiding exposed content in DAM+OIL Frank van Harmelen (12/27/00)
• Re: Avoiding exposed content in DAM+OIL Stefan Decker (12/27/00)
• parseType="daml:collection" Frank van Harmelen (12/27/00)
• daml.org DNS outage mdean@daml.org (12/29/00)
• daml.org available again Mike Dean (01/03/01)
• Joint Committee Minutes 2 January 2001 Mike Dean (01/04/01)
• Where did these syntax constraints come from? Dan Connolly (01/04/01)
• Re: Where did these syntax constraints come from? Jim Hendler (01/04/01)
• Re: Rules for restrictions Dan Connolly (01/04/01)
• [Fwd: Rules for restrictions] Dan Connolly (01/04/01)
• Re: [Fwd: Rules for restrictions] Dan Connolly (01/04/01)
• Re: [Fwd: Rules for restrictions](same..As, equivalentTo) Dan Connolly (01/04/01)
• [Fwd: Tambis test files for RDF, DAML and notation3.] Dan Connolly (01/04/01)
• Re: [Fwd: Rules for restrictions] Dan Connolly (01/04/01)
• Re: Rules for restrictions Ian Horrocks (01/04/01)
• Re: [Fwd: Tambis test files for RDF, DAML and notation3.] Ian Horrocks (01/05/01)
• Re: [Fwd: Rules for restrictions] Ian Horrocks (01/05/01)
• Re: New version of walk-through available Deborah Mcguinness (01/05/01)
• Re: about vs. ID Tim Berners-Lee (01/05/01)
• Re: Joint Committee Minutes 2 January 2001 Tim Berners-Lee (01/05/01)
• updated version of the axiomatic semantics Deborah Mcguinness (01/06/01)
• Re: about vs. ID Frank van Harmelen (01/07/01)
• Re: about vs. ID Dan Connolly (01/07/01)
• cyclical subclass/property statements Ian Horrocks (01/07/01)
• Re: New version of walk-through available Frank van Harmelen (01/07/01)
• Re: (Part 1) Where did these syntax constraints come from? Frank van Harmelen (01/07/01)
• Re: (Part 2) Where did these syntax constraints come from? Frank van Harmelen (01/07/01)
• Re: about vs. ID Frank van Harmelen (01/07/01)
• Re: about vs. ID Mike Dean (01/07/01)
• Re: (Part 1) Where did these syntax constraints come from? Peter F. Patel-Schneider (01/08/01)
• Re: (Part 2) Where did these syntax constraints come from? Peter F. Patel-Schneider (01/08/01)
• Representing Order in RDF Stefan Decker (01/09/01)
• Checking the DAML example Stefan Decker (01/09/01)
• Re: (Part 1) Where did these syntax constraints come from? Stefan Decker (01/09/01)
• Re: Joint Committee Minutes 2 January 2001 Ian Horrocks (01/09/01)
• Re: Joint Committee Minutes 2 January 2001 Ian Horrocks (01/09/01)
• Re: Checking the DAML example Frank van Harmelen (01/09/01)
• Re: New version of walk-through available Jeff Heflin (01/09/01)
• Joint Committee telecon today Mike Dean (01/09/01)
• Re: Joint Committee telecon today Deborah Mcguinness (01/09/01)
• Re: Joint Committee telecon today (semantics for domain and range) Peter F. Patel-Schneider (01/09/01)
• Re: Joint Committee telecon today (semantics for domain and range) Dan Connolly (01/09/01)
• Re: Joint Committee telecon today (semantics for domain and range) Peter F. Patel-Schneider (01/09/01)
• Re: Joint Committee telecon today Frank van Harmelen (01/09/01)
• identity (or equality) missing from DAML and DAML+OIL Peter F. Patel-Schneider (01/09/01)
• Re: about vs. ID pat hayes (01/09/01)
• the daml example Deborah Mcguinness (01/09/01)
• Re: Joint Committee telecon today Deborah Mcguinness (01/09/01)
• Re: about vs. ID Peter F. Patel-Schneider (01/09/01)
• Re: (Part 1) Where did these syntax constraints come from? pat hayes (01/09/01)
• Re: the daml example Frank van Harmelen (01/09/01)
• Re: the daml example Peter F. Patel-Schneider (01/09/01)
• Re: the daml example Deborah Mcguinness (01/09/01)
• Re: (Part 1) Where did these syntax constraints come from? Peter F. Patel-Schneider (01/09/01)
• Re: (Part 2) Where did these syntax constraints come from? pat hayes (01/09/01)
• Re: (Part 1) Where did these syntax constraints come from? Dan Connolly (01/09/01)
• Re: (Part 2) Where did these syntax constraints come from? Peter F. Patel-Schneider (01/09/01)
• Re: Joint Committee telecon today (semantics for domain and range) Tim Berners-Lee (01/09/01)
• Re: the daml example Jessica Jenkins (01/09/01)
• Re: the daml example Dan Connolly (01/09/01)
• Semantics questions Lynn Andrea Stein (01/09/01)
• Re: Joint Committee telecon today Peter F. Patel-Schneider (01/09/01)
• Re: Semantics questions Peter F. Patel-Schneider (01/09/01)
• http://www.daml.org/2000/12/ Mike Dean (01/09/01)
• Re: http://www.daml.org/2000/12/ Deborah McGuinness (01/09/01)
• Pre-final release versions available Frank van Harmelen (01/10/01)
• Re: Pre-final release versions available Peter F. Patel-Schneider (01/10/01)
• Re: Pre-final release versions available Deborah Mcguinness (01/10/01)
• Re: Pre-final release versions available Frank van Harmelen (01/10/01)
• New release of daml+oil Ian Horrocks (01/10/01)
• Re: the daml example Ian Horrocks (01/10/01)
• Re: the daml example Frank van Harmelen (01/10/01)
• Re: New release of daml+oil Stefan Decker (01/10/01)
• Re: New release of daml+oil Ian Horrocks (01/10/01)
• (no subject) Stefan Decker (01/10/01)
• (no subject) Peter F. Patel-Schneider (01/10/01)
• DAML+OIL release Ian Horrocks (01/10/01)
• Re: RDF vs the Rest of the World Stefan Decker (01/10/01)
• Re: [on the value of RDF] Dan Connolly (01/10/01)
• Re: [on the value of RDF] Peter F. Patel-Schneider (01/10/01)
• Re: [on the value of RDF] Stefan Decker (01/10/01)
• Re: [on the value of RDF] Stefan Decker (01/10/01)
• Re: Pre-final release versions available Frank van Harmelen (01/11/01)
• Re: DAML+OIL release Frank van Harmelen (01/11/01)
• Re: Pre-final release versions available Deborah Mcguinness (01/11/01)
• Ready for release Frank van Harmelen (01/11/01)
• Re: Ready for release Peter F. Patel-Schneider (01/11/01)
• Re: Ready for release Deborah Mcguinness (01/11/01)
• Re: Ready for release Ian Horrocks (01/11/01)
• Re: Ready for release Ian Horrocks (01/11/01)
• Re: Semantics questions Lynn Andrea Stein (01/11/01)
• Re: Ready for release Deborah McGuinness (01/11/01)
• Re: Ready for release Ian Horrocks (01/11/01)
• Re: Semantics questions Lynn Andrea Stein (01/11/01)
• Re: Semantics questions Peter F. Patel-Schneider (01/11/01)
• Re: Ready for release Peter F. Patel-Schneider (01/11/01)
• Re: Semantics questions Peter F. Patel-Schneider (01/11/01)
• DAML+OIL released Mike Dean (01/11/01)
• Re: [on the value of RDF] Peter F. Patel-Schneider (01/12/01)
• problems with DAML+OIL Peter F. Patel-Schneider (01/12/01)
• RE: Ready for release jhendler (01/12/01)
• Re: Ready for release Mike Dean (01/12/01)
• Re: problems with DAML+OIL Jim Hendler (01/15/01)
• Re: problems with DAML+OIL pat hayes (01/15/01)
• Re: problems with DAML+OIL Peter F. Patel-Schneider (01/16/01)
• Re: problems with DAML+OIL Peter F. Patel-Schneider (01/16/01)
• Re: problems with DAML+OIL Jeff Heflin (01/16/01)
• Re: problems with DAML+OIL Peter F. Patel-Schneider (01/16/01)
• Re: DAML+OIL release Tim Berners-Lee (01/16/01)
• Joint Committee Minutes 9 January 2001 Mike Dean (01/16/01)
• Joint Committee telecon today Mike Dean (01/16/01)
• progress on XML Schema datatype integration Dan Connolly (01/16/01)
• Re: Joint Committee telecon today (concrete types) Dan Connolly (01/16/01)
• Re: Joint Committee telecon today Mike Dean (01/16/01)
• Possible model theoretic semantics for equivalentTo Jeff Heflin (01/16/01)
• Explosive Stock Alert bk12bk27@yahoo.com (01/16/01)
• Joint Committee Minutes 16 January 2001 Mike Dean (01/16/01)
• Re: DAML+OIL release Deborah Mcguinness (01/18/01)
• Extending daml+oil with concrete datatypes Ian Horrocks (01/22/01)
• Joint Committee telecon today Mike Dean (01/23/01)
• Re: Joint Committee telecon today Jim Hendler (01/23/01)
• Re: Joint Committee telecon today Peter F. Patel-Schneider (01/23/01)
• Re: Joint Committee telecon today Mike Dean (01/23/01)
• Re: about vs. ID Lynn Andrea Stein (01/23/01)
• Re: Joint Committee telecon today Lynn Andrea Stein (01/23/01)
• Re: Joint Committee telecon today Mike Dean (01/23/01)
• new www.daml.org Mike Dean (01/23/01)
• concrete extension Peter F. Patel-Schneider (01/23/01)
• Re: concrete extension Jeff Heflin (01/23/01)
• Joint Committee Minutes 23 January 2001 Mike Dean (01/24/01)
• Re: Joint Committee Minutes 23 January 2001 Peter F. Patel-Schneider (01/24/01)
• Re: daml+oil Mike Dean (01/26/01)
• Suggested changes to concrete datatypes proposal Jeff Heflin (01/29/01)
• Re: Suggested changes to concrete datatypes proposal Peter F. Patel-Schneider (01/30/01)
• Re: Suggested changes to concrete datatypes proposal Peter F. Patel-Schneider (01/30/01)
• Re: Suggested changes to concrete datatypes proposal Peter F. Patel-Schneider (01/30/01)
• DAMl "Thing" should be Top, Universal class - including concrete types Tim Berners-Lee (01/30/01)
• Joint Committee telecon today 30 January Mike Dean (01/30/01)
• Re: Suggested changes to concrete datatypes proposal Jeff Heflin (01/30/01)
• Re: Suggested changes to concrete datatypes proposal Ian Horrocks (01/30/01)
• Re: Suggested changes to concrete datatypes proposal Jeff Heflin (01/30/01)
• Re: Suggested changes to concrete datatypes proposal Ian Horrocks (01/30/01)
• Re: Suggested changes to concrete datatypes proposal Peter F. Patel-Schneider (01/30/01)
• Re: Suggested changes to concrete datatypes proposal Jeff Heflin (01/30/01)
• Re: Suggested changes to concrete datatypes proposal Ian Horrocks (01/30/01)
• Joint Committee Minutes 30 January 2001 Mike Dean (01/30/01)
• Concrete types: next steps? Frank van Harmelen (01/31/01)
• Re: Concrete types: next steps? Dan Connolly (01/31/01)
• Re: Concrete types: next steps? Ian Horrocks (02/01/01)
• Re: Concrete types: next steps? Ian Horrocks (02/01/01)
• Re: Concrete types: next steps? Peter F. Patel-Schneider (02/01/01)
• Re: Concrete types: next steps? Peter F. Patel-Schneider (02/01/01)
• Re: Concrete types: next steps? Dan Connolly (02/01/01)
• daml+oil+concrete includes XML Schema syntax? [was: ... next steps?] Dan Connolly (02/01/01)
• Re: daml+oil+concrete includes XML Schema syntax? [was: ... next steps?] Peter F. Patel-Schneider (02/01/01)
• ``universal use'' languages Peter F. Patel-Schneider (02/01/01)
• on disjointness motivation Dan Connolly (02/01/01)
• Re: daml+oil+concrete includes XML Schema syntax? [was: ... nextsteps?] Dan Connolly (02/01/01)
• Re: ``universal use'' languages Dan Connolly (02/01/01)
• Re: on disjointness motivation Ian Horrocks (02/01/01)
• Re: Concrete types: next steps? Jim Hendler (02/01/01)
• Re: Concrete types: next steps? Peter F. Patel-Schneider (02/02/01)
• Re: Concrete types: next steps? Jim Hendler (02/05/01)
• Re: DAMl "Thing" should be Top, Universal class - including concrete types pat hayes (02/06/01)
• Re: DAMl "Thing" should be Top, Universal class - including concrete types Ian Horrocks (02/06/01)
• Joint Committee telecon today 6 February Mike Dean (02/06/01)
• [Fwd: DAML Presentation Description] Dan Connolly (02/06/01)
• Re: Concrete types: next steps? Frank van Harmelen (02/06/01)
• Re: Concrete types: next steps? Dan Connolly (02/06/01)
• added diagrams to "Using XML Schema Data Types..." Dan Connolly (02/06/01)
• Weekly summary on predefined classes :-) Frank van Harmelen (02/07/01)
• Re: Weekly summary on predefined classes :-) Peter F. Patel-Schneider (02/07/01)
• Re: added diagrams to "Using XML Schema Data Types..." Peter F. Patel-Schneider (02/07/01)
• Re: added diagrams to "Using XML Schema Data Types..." Dan Connolly (02/07/01)
• Re: added diagrams to "Using XML Schema Data Types..." Peter F. Patel-Schneider (02/07/01)
• Re: added diagrams to "Using XML Schema Data Types..." Dan Connolly (02/07/01)
• Re: trusting external information Peter F. Patel-Schneider (02/07/01)
• Re: added diagrams to "Using XML Schema Data Types..." Jim Hendler (02/07/01)
• Re: added diagrams to "Using XML Schema Data Types..." Peter F. Patel-Schneider (02/07/01)
• Re: added diagrams to "Using XML Schema Data Types..." Dan Connolly (02/07/01)
• Re: trusting external information Dan Connolly (02/07/01)
• Re: added diagrams to "Using XML Schema Data Types..." pat hayes (02/07/01)
• Re: added diagrams to "Using XML Schema Data Types..." pat hayes (02/07/01)
• Re: added diagrams to "Using XML Schema Data Types..." Dan Connolly (02/08/01)
• no Joint Committee tomorrow 13 February Mike Dean (02/12/01)
• Re: No Joint Committee telecon today - but language meeting tomorrow Dlmcg1@aol.com (02/13/01)
• Re: No Joint Committee telecon today - but language meeting tomorrow Kelly Barber (02/13/01)
• new syntax for datatypes Peter Patel-Schneider (02/15/01)
• new syntax for datatypes Ian Horrocks (02/15/01)
• Re: new syntax for datatypes Dan Connolly (02/15/01)
• Re: new syntax for datatypes Ian Horrocks (02/15/01)
• Re: new syntax for datatypes Peter F. Patel-Schneider (02/16/01)
• Re: URIs for primitive datatypes and facets? Dan Connolly (02/17/01)
• Re: URIs for primitive datatypes and facets? (CR-48) Dan Connolly (02/17/01)
• Re: URIs for primitive datatypes and facets? Tim Berners-Lee (02/20/01)
• some experience with concrete types Mike Dean (02/20/01)
• Re: some experience with concrete types Ian Horrocks (02/20/01)
• Joint Committee telecon today 20 February Mike Dean (02/20/01)
• Re: Joint Committee telecon today 20 February Peter F. Patel-Schneider (02/20/01)
• axioms and (not) changing a language Peter F. Patel-Schneider (02/20/01)
• Re: axioms and (not) changing a language Dan Connolly (02/20/01)
• literals and equality Peter F. Patel-Schneider (02/21/01)
• Re: axioms and (not) changing a language Peter F. Patel-Schneider (02/21/01)
• summary of status with respect to datatypes Peter F. Patel-Schneider (02/22/01)
• one thing to agitate for at the RDF meeting Peter F. Patel-Schneider (02/22/01)
• Re: one thing to agitate for at the RDF meeting Dan Connolly (02/22/01)
• Re: summary of status with respect to datatypes Dan Connolly (02/22/01)
• Re: one thing to agitate for at the RDF meeting Jeff Heflin (02/22/01)
• summary of status with respect to datatypes [revised] Peter F. Patel-Schneider (02/22/01)
• Re: summary of status with respect to datatypes Peter F. Patel-Schneider (02/22/01)
• Re: summary of status with respect to datatypes Dan Connolly (02/22/01)
• daml+oil+dt examples, etc. Mike Dean (02/22/01)
• A few more things to agitate for at the RDF meeting Frank van Harmelen (02/22/01)
• Re: A few more things to agitate for at the RDF meeting Dan Brickley (02/23/01)
• DAML briefing to RDF IG Mike Dean (02/26/01)
• Re: DAML briefing to RDF IG Frank van Harmelen (02/26/01)
• Re: DAML briefing to RDF IG Ian Horrocks (02/26/01)
• Re: DAML briefing to RDF IG Peter F. Patel-Schneider (02/26/01)
• Re: DAML briefing to RDF IG Stefan Decker (02/26/01)
• Joint Committee telecon today 27 February Mike Dean (02/27/01)
• Re: Joint Committee telecon today 27 February Mike Dean (02/27/01)
• daml+oil+dt release v4.1 Ian Horrocks (02/27/01)
• Re: DAML briefing to RDF IG pat hayes (02/27/01)
• daml:SymmetricProperty? Mike Dean (03/01/01)
• Re: daml:SymmetricProperty? Jim Hendler (03/01/01)
• Re: daml:SymmetricProperty? Ian Horrocks (03/01/01)
• Re: daml:SymmetricProperty? Ian Horrocks (03/01/01)
• DAML and Dublin Core: incompatibility? Dan Brickley (03/01/01)
• Re: daml:SymmetricProperty? Jim Hendler (03/01/01)
• Re: daml:SymmetricProperty? Ian Horrocks (03/01/01)
• Re: DAML and Dublin Core: incompatibility? Dan Connolly (03/03/01)
• Joint Committee Minutes 27 February 2001 Mike Dean (03/03/01)
• DAML+OIL (March 2001), CVS Mike Dean (03/03/01)
• Re: DAML and Dublin Core: incompatibility? Ian Horrocks (03/03/01)
• Re: DAML and Dublin Core: incompatibility? Dan Brickley (03/03/01)
• Re: DAML and Dublin Core: incompatibility? Dan Brickley (03/03/01)
• Re: Joint Committee Minutes 27 February 2001 Dan Connolly (03/03/01)
• Re: DAML and Dublin Core: incompatibility? Dan Connolly (03/03/01)
• Re: DAML and Dublin Core: incompatibility? Ian Horrocks (03/03/01)
• Re: DAML+OIL (March 2001), CVS Deborah Mcguinness (03/03/01)
• Re: Joint Committee Minutes 27 February 2001 Mike Dean (03/04/01)
• Re: DAML and Dublin Core: incompatibility? Mike Dean (03/04/01)
• Re: DAML and Dublin Core: incompatibility? Peter F. Patel-Schneider (03/05/01)
• Re: DAML and Dublin Core: incompatibility? Peter F. Patel-Schneider (03/05/01)
• DAML and reification Mike Dean (03/05/01)
• reification use cases Mike Dean (03/05/01)
• Re: DAML and reification Peter F. Patel-Schneider (03/05/01)
• Re: DAML and reification Jim Hendler (03/05/01)
• A few comments on the new DAML-OIL spec Jeff Heflin (03/05/01)
• Re: DAML+OIL (March 2001), CVS Richard Fikes (03/05/01)
• Re: DAML and reification pat hayes (03/05/01)
• Re: DAML+OIL (March 2001), CVS Peter F. Patel-Schneider (03/05/01)
• Joint Committee telecon today 6 March Mike Dean (03/06/01)
• Re: Joint Committee telecon today 6 March Frank van Harmelen (03/06/01)
• Re: A few comments on the new DAML-OIL spec Peter F. Patel-Schneider (03/06/01)
• Re: A few comments on the new DAML-OIL spec Peter F. Patel-Schneider (03/06/01)
• Proof carrying code and proofs Jim Hendler (03/06/01)
• Acknowledgement of contributions Ian Horrocks (03/07/01)
• Re: Acknowledgement of contributions Jim Hendler (03/07/01)
• Re: Acknowledgement of contributions Mike Dean (03/08/01)
• acknowledging code contributors Mike Dean (03/08/01)
• Re: acknowledging code contributors Stefan Decker (03/08/01)
• Re: A few comments on the new DAML-OIL spec Peter F. Patel-Schneider (03/08/01)
• Re: A few comments on the new DAML-OIL spec Ian Horrocks (03/08/01)
• Re: A few comments on the new DAML-OIL spec Peter F. Patel-Schneider (03/08/01)
• Re: acknowledging code contributors Frank van Harmelen (03/08/01)
• Re: acknowledging code contributors Jim Hendler (03/08/01)
• Joint Committee Minutes 6 March 2001 Mike Dean (03/12/01)
• Joint Committee telecon today 13 March Mike Dean (03/13/01)
• KT2001 trip report [was: Joint Committee telecon today 13 March] Dan Connolly (03/13/01)
• Re: Joint Committee telecon today 13 March Stefan Decker (03/13/01)
• Announcement: Robin Patrick Decker Stefan Decker (03/18/01)
• Joint Committee Minutes 13 March 2001 Mike Dean (03/19/01)
• Joint Committee telecon today 20 March Mike Dean (03/20/01)
• N3/cwm on Windows Mike Dean (03/20/01)
• equivalentTo Peter F. Patel-Schneider (03/21/01)
• Re: equivalentTo Dan Brickley (03/21/01)
• Re: new walkthrough Mike Dean (03/21/01)
• Re: equivalentTo Jim Hendler (03/21/01)
• Re: new walkthrough pat hayes (03/21/01)
• Re: new walkthrough Frank van Harmelen (03/21/01)
• Examples, etc. - instances? Jim Hendler (03/21/01)
• NEVER MIND Jim Hendler (03/21/01)
• comments on Reference description pat hayes (03/21/01)
• further de-abstraction details pat hayes (03/21/01)
• Re: comments on Reference description Dan Connolly (03/21/01)
• Re: equivalentTo Dan Connolly (03/21/01)
• Re: equivalentTo pat hayes (03/21/01)
• Re: new walkthrough Mike Dean (03/22/01)
• Re: comments on Reference description Frank van Harmelen (03/22/01)
• Re: equivalentTo Ian Horrocks (03/22/01)
• Re: further de-abstraction details Ian Horrocks (03/22/01)
• Re: equivalentTo Ian Horrocks (03/22/01)
• Re: further de-abstraction details Peter F. Patel-Schneider (03/22/01)
• Re: equivalentTo Peter F. Patel-Schneider (03/22/01)
• Re: further de-abstraction details Jim Hendler (03/22/01)
• Re: equivalentTo Jim Hendler (03/22/01)
• Re: N3/cwm on Windows Mike Dean (03/22/01)
• Re: new walkthrough Peter F. Patel-Schneider (03/22/01)
• Re: new walkthrough (rdfs:label usage) Dan Connolly (03/22/01)
• Re: comments on Reference description Mike Dean (03/22/01)
• terminating 'imports' loops pat hayes (03/22/01)
• Re: terminating 'imports' loops Peter F. Patel-Schneider (03/22/01)
• Re: terminating 'imports' loops Dan Connolly (03/22/01)
• RE: new walkthrough (rdfs:label usage) Ora.Lassila@nokia.com (03/22/01)
• Re: equivalentTo Jeff Heflin (03/22/01)
• Re: terminating 'imports' loops pat hayes (03/22/01)
• Re: terminating 'imports' loops Frank van Harmelen (03/22/01)
• Re: comments on Reference description pat hayes (03/22/01)
• Re: terminating 'imports' loops Dan Connolly (03/23/01)
• Re: equivalentTo pat hayes (03/23/01)
• Re: terminating 'imports' loops pat hayes (03/23/01)
• Re: terminating 'imports' loops Dan Connolly (03/23/01)
• Formalizing XML schema jhendler (03/23/01)
• Re: terminating 'imports' loops (messages/events) Dan Connolly (03/23/01)
• Tagging Jim Hendler (03/26/01)
• Joint Committee Minutes 20 March 2001 Mike Dean (03/27/01)
• Joint Committee telecon today 27 March Mike Dean (03/27/01)
• Re: Joint Committee telecon today 27 March Dan Connolly (03/27/01)
• walkthru and reference doc Kelly Barber (03/27/01)
• Re: walkthru and reference doc Peter F. Patel-Schneider (03/27/01)
• DAML+OIL (March 2001) released Mike Dean (03/28/01)
• Joint Committee Minutes 27 March 2001 Mike Dean (04/02/01)
• Joint Committee telecon today 3 April Mike Dean (04/03/01)
• Re: Tagging Jeff Heflin (04/03/01)
• Re: Joint Committee telecon today 3 April Peter F. Patel-Schneider (04/03/01)
• Re: Joint Committee telecon today 3 April Jeff Heflin (04/03/01)
• Re: Joint Committee telecon today 3 April Mike Dean (04/03/01)
• Contentious issues document Frank van Harmelen (04/03/01)
• Joint Committee Minutes 3 April 2001 Mike Dean (04/09/01)
• Re: Joint Committee Minutes 3 April 2001 pat hayes (04/09/01)
• Joint Committee telecon today 10 April Mike Dean (04/10/01)
• Re: Tagging Mike Dean (04/10/01)
• Re: Joint Committee telecon today 10 April Peter F. Patel-Schneider (04/10/01)
• Re: Joint Committee telecon today 10 April Mike Dean (04/10/01)
• Re: Joint Committee telecon today 10 April Deborah Mcguinness (04/10/01)
• Joint Committee Minutes 10 April 2001 Mike Dean (04/10/01)
• Joint Committee telecon today 17 April Mike Dean (04/17/01)
• DAML+OIL Light Stefan Decker (04/17/01)
• Re: DAML+OIL Light Jim Hendler (04/18/01)
• Re: DAML+OIL Light Frank van Harmelen (04/18/01)
• RE: Joint Committee telecon today 17 April Martin, Tom (04/18/01)
• Re: DAML+OIL Light Stefan Decker (04/19/01)
• (no subject) Ian Horrocks (04/23/01)
• Joint Committee Minutes 17 April 2001 Mike Dean (04/24/01)
• Joint Committee telecon today 24 April Mike Dean (04/24/01)
• Re: Joint Committee telecon today 24 April Mike Dean (04/24/01)
• Semantic Web panel at WWW10 Frank van Harmelen (04/24/01)
• DAML+OIL and FIPA Frank van Harmelen (04/24/01)
• Re: Semantic Web panel at WWW10 Stefan Decker (04/24/01)
• Re: Joint Committee telecon today 24 April Dan Connolly (04/24/01)
• Urgent! Semantic question about rdfs:domain. pat hayes (04/24/01)
• Re: Joint Committee telecon today 24 April Jim Hendler (04/24/01)
• Re: Urgent! Semantic question about rdfs:domain. Dan Connolly (04/24/01)
• Re: Urgent! Semantic question about rdfs:domain. Lynn Andrea Stein (04/25/01)
• URIs on SIPRNET Mike Dean (04/25/01)
• Re: URIs on SIPRNET Dan Connolly (04/25/01)
• Re: Joint Committee telecon today 24 April pat hayes (04/25/01)
• Re: Urgent! Semantic question about rdfs:domain. pat hayes (04/25/01)
• Re: Urgent! Semantic question about rdfs:domain. Jeff Heflin (04/25/01)
• Re: Urgent! Semantic question about rdfs:domain. pat hayes (04/25/01)
• Re: Urgent! Semantic question about rdfs:domain. Ian Horrocks (04/25/01)
• Re: Range interpretation question. Ian Horrocks (04/25/01)
• Re: Urgent! Semantic question about rdfs:domain. Ian Horrocks (04/25/01)
• Re: Urgent! Semantic question about rdfs:domain. pat hayes (04/25/01)
• no Joint Committee telecon tomorrow 1 May Mike Dean (04/30/01)
• Re: no Joint Committee telecon tomorrow 1 May pat hayes (04/30/01)
• Shoes Source@Source-Indonesia.com (05/01/01)
• Joint Committee Minutes 24 April 2001 Mike Dean (05/04/01)
• Re: Joint Committee Minutes 24 April 2001 Peter F. Patel-Schneider (05/04/01)
• Re: Joint Committee Minutes 24 April 2001 Peter F. Patel-Schneider (05/04/01)
• Re: Joint Committee Minutes 24 April 2001 Mike Dean (05/04/01)
• Joint Committee telecon tomorrow 8 May Mike Dean (05/07/01)
• Re: Joint Committee telecon tomorrow 8 May Frank van Harmelen (05/07/01)
• Re: Joint Committee telecon tomorrow 8 May Dieter Fensel (05/07/01)
• Re: Joint Committee telecon tomorrow 8 May Deborah McGuinness (05/07/01)
• Re: Joint Committee telecon tomorrow 8 May Deborah McGuinness (05/07/01)
• Re: Joint Committee telecon tomorrow 8 May Dan Connolly (05/07/01)
• Re: Joint Committee telecon tomorrow 8 May Peter F. Patel-Schneider (05/07/01)
• Tim's paper Kelly Barber (05/08/01)
• Re: Joint Committee telecon tomorrow 8 May pat hayes (05/10/01)
• Joint Committee Meeting tomorrow May 15 Deborah Mcguinness (05/14/01)
• Re: Joint Committee Meeting tomorrow May 15 John Flynn (05/15/01)
• Re: Joint Committee Meeting tomorrow May 15 pat hayes (05/15/01)
• DAML+OIL Layer 1 Stefan Decker (05/15/01)
• revised thinking on RDF reification, imports Dan Connolly (05/15/01)
• Re: revised thinking on RDF reification, imports Dan Connolly (05/15/01)
• enhancing Unambiguous to be domain-dependent Dan Connolly (05/16/01)
• a recipie for ont:UnambiguousProperty, rdfs:isDefinedBy Dan Connolly (05/16/01)
• Re: a recipie for ont:UnambiguousProperty, rdfs:isDefinedBy Dan Connolly (05/16/01)
• Re: enhancing Unambiguous to be domain-dependent Ian Horrocks (05/16/01)
• Re: enhancing Unambiguous to be domain-dependent Dan Connolly (05/16/01)
• Re: enhancing Unambiguous to be domain-dependent Jim Hendler (05/21/01)
• Joint Committee Meeting tomorrow May 22 Deborah Mcguinness (05/21/01)
• Re: Joint Committee Meeting tomorrow May 22 Ian Horrocks (05/22/01)
• Re: Joint Committee Meeting tomorrow May 22 Lynn Andrea Stein (05/22/01)
• Re: Joint Committee Meeting tomorrow May 22 Stefan Decker (05/22/01)
• Re: Joint Committee Meeting tomorrow May 22 Mike Dean (05/22/01)
• Re: Joint Committee Meeting tomorrow May 22 Peter F. Patel-Schneider (05/22/01)
• How do I do this? Jim Hendler (05/22/01)
• Re: Joint Committee Meeting tomorrow May 22 pat hayes (05/24/01)
• Joint Committee Telecon today? Peter F. Patel-Schneider (05/29/01)
• Re: Joint Committee Telecon today? Mike Dean (05/29/01)
• rule proto-proposal Peter F. Patel-Schneider (05/29/01)
• Joint Committee telecon today 29 May Mike Dean (05/29/01)
• Re: rule proto-proposal Ian Horrocks (05/29/01)
• Re: rule proto-proposal pat hayes (05/29/01)
• Re: rule proto-proposal pat hayes (05/29/01)
• DAML Layer Stefan Decker (05/29/01)
• Re: rule proto-proposal Stefan Decker (05/29/01)
• Joint Committee Minutes 22 May 2001 Mike Dean (05/29/01)
• Re: rule proto-proposal pat hayes (05/29/01)
• Re: rule proto-proposal Stefan Decker (05/29/01)
• Re: rule proto-proposal pat hayes (05/29/01)
• Re: rule proto-proposal Stefan Decker (05/30/01)
• Re: rule proto-proposal pat hayes (05/30/01)
• Re: rule proto-proposal Peter F. Patel-Schneider (05/30/01)
• Re: rule proto-proposal Stefan Decker (05/30/01)
• Re: rule proto-proposal Stefan Decker (05/30/01)
• Joint Committee Minutes 29 May 2001 Mike Dean (05/30/01)
• Re: rule proto-proposal pat hayes (05/30/01)
• A comment on DAML FAQ pat hayes (05/30/01)
• Re: rule proto-proposal Stefan Decker (05/30/01)
• Re: rule proto-proposal pat hayes (05/30/01)
• DAML PI Meeting info Mike Dean (05/31/01)
• Re: rule proto-proposal Stefan Decker (05/31/01)
• Re: rule proto-proposal pat hayes (05/31/01)
• Re: rule proto-proposal Peter F. Patel-Schneider (05/31/01)
• Re: rule proto-proposal Dan Connolly (05/31/01)
• Re: rule proto-proposal Dan Connolly (05/31/01)
• Re: rule proto-proposal Stefan Decker (05/31/01)
• Re: rule proto-proposal Stefan Decker (05/31/01)
• Re: rule proto-proposal pat hayes (05/31/01)
• Re: rule proto-proposal Peter F. Patel-Schneider (05/31/01)
• Re: rule proto-proposal pat hayes (05/31/01)
• Re: rule proto-proposal Jim Hendler (05/31/01)
• Re: rule proto-proposal Frank van Harmelen (06/01/01)
• Re: rule proto-proposal Dan Connolly (06/01/01)
• Re: rule proto-proposal pat hayes (06/01/01)
• Joint Committee telecon tomorrow 5 June Mike Dean (06/04/01)
• teleconf tonight Frank van Harmelen (06/05/01)
• Re: rule proto-proposal Frank van Harmelen (06/05/01)
• DAM+OIL agent application competition Frank van Harmelen (06/05/01)
• Re: rule proto-proposal Peter F. Patel-Schneider (06/05/01)
• DAML Rules!!! pat hayes (06/05/01)
• Re: A comment on DAML FAQ Deborah Mcguinness (06/05/01)
• Re: A comment on DAML FAQ pat hayes (06/05/01)
• Re: A comment on DAML FAQ Ian Horrocks (06/06/01)
• Re: A comment on DAML FAQ Deborah McGuinness (06/06/01)
• Re: A comment on DAML FAQ Jim Hendler (06/06/01)
• Re: A comment on DAML FAQ pat hayes (06/06/01)
• Re: DAM+OIL agent application competition Mike Dean (06/07/01)
• Re: properties with classes as values? pat hayes (06/07/01)
• GlaxoSmithKline choose DAML+OIL Ian Horrocks (06/08/01)
• Joint Committee telecon Tuesday 12 June Mike Dean (06/08/01)
• Re: rule proto-proposal Ian Horrocks (06/09/01)
• Re: A comment on DAML FAQ Ian Horrocks (06/09/01)
• Re: A comment on DAML FAQ Deborah Mcguinness (06/09/01)
• Re: rule proto-proposal pat hayes (06/11/01)
• Specific Language Extension Suggestion Jim Hendler (06/12/01)
• N3 version of daml+oil.daml Jim Hendler (06/14/01)
• Re: N3 version of daml+oil.daml (KIF version, too) Dan Connolly (06/15/01)
• Joint Committee telecon today 19 June Mike Dean (06/19/01)
• Framework for specifying "reasonable" properties Ian Horrocks (06/19/01)
• [Automated theorem prover finds inconsistencies in DAML+OIL] Mike Dean (06/20/01)
• Coordination between RDF(S) and DAML+OIL Peter F. Patel-Schneider (06/24/01)
• Re: Coordination between RDF(S) and DAML+OIL Dan Brickley (06/24/01)
• Re: Coordination between RDF(S) and DAML+OIL Peter F. Patel-Schneider (06/24/01)
• Joint Committee Minutes June 5-19 Mike Dean (06/25/01)
• Joint Committee telecon today 26 June Mike Dean (06/26/01)
• Re: Joint Committee telecon today 26 June Stefan Decker (06/26/01)
• acyclical lists in DAML+OIL Ian Horrocks (06/27/01)
• Joint Committee Minutes June 26 Mike Dean (07/03/01)
• Joint Committee telecon today 3 July Mike Dean (07/03/01)
• DAML RULES Stefan Decker (07/03/01)
• Coordination with RDF Core Frank van Harmelen (07/04/01)
• Re: Coordination with RDF Core Jim Hendler (07/05/01)
• Re: Coordination with RDF Core Frank van Harmelen (07/05/01)
• Re: Coordination with RDF Core Ian Horrocks (07/06/01)
• Re: Coordination with RDF Core pat hayes (07/06/01)
• equivalentTo / sameClassAs / sameIndividualAs puzzle Dan Brickley (07/07/01)
• Re: Coordination with RDF Core Frank van Harmelen (07/09/01)
• Re: Coordination with RDF Core Dan Brickley (07/09/01)
• Re: equivalentTo / sameClassAs / sameIndividualAs puzzle Ian Horrocks (07/09/01)
• Re: Coordination with RDF Core Peter F. Patel-Schneider (07/09/01)
• Re: Coordination with RDF Core Dan Connolly (07/09/01)
• Re: equivalentTo / sameClassAs / sameIndividualAs puzzle Jim Hendler (07/09/01)
• Re: equivalentTo / sameClassAs / sameIndividualAs puzzle Jeff Heflin (07/09/01)
• Joint Committee Minutes July 3 Mike Dean (07/09/01)
• Re: equivalentTo / sameClassAs / sameIndividualAs puzzle Dan Brickley (07/09/01)
• Re: equivalentTo / sameClassAs / sameIndividualAs puzzle pat hayes (07/09/01)
• Re: Coordination with RDF Core pat hayes (07/09/01)
• Re: Coordination with RDF Core pat hayes (07/09/01)
• Re: Coordination with RDF Core Dan Brickley (07/09/01)
• Re: Coordination with RDF Core pat hayes (07/09/01)
• Re: equivalentTo / sameClassAs / sameIndividualAs puzzle pat hayes (07/09/01)
• Joint Committee telecon today 10 July Mike Dean (07/10/01)
• Re: Joint Committee telecon today 10 July Dan Connolly (07/10/01)
• Re: Coordination with RDF Core Frank van Harmelen (07/10/01)
• DAML Rules Usage Examples... Stefan Decker (07/10/01)
• Re: equivalentTo / sameClassAs / sameIndividualAs puzzle Ian Horrocks (07/10/01)
• Re: Joint Committee telecon today 10 July Jim Hendler (07/10/01)
• Re: Joint Committee telecon today 10 July Mike Dean (07/10/01)
• Coordination points between RDF(S) and DAML+OIL Frank van Harmelen (07/11/01)
• Re: equivalentTo / sameClassAs / sameIndividualAs puzzle pat hayes (07/12/01)
• Re: equivalentTo / sameClassAs / sameIndividualAs puzzle Ian Horrocks (07/12/01)
• Rules and proofs - examples Jim Hendler (07/13/01)
• Re: DAML RULES -- logic programs, Webizing, RuleML new release (resend) Benjamin Grosof (07/13/01)
• telecon(s) next week Mike Dean (07/13/01)
• Re: equivalentTo / sameClassAs / sameIndividualAs puzzle pat hayes (07/13/01)
• Re: equivalentTo / sameClassAs / sameIndividualAs puzzle Ian Horrocks (07/15/01)
• Joint Committee Minutes July 10 Mike Dean (07/16/01)
• F2F location Mike Dean (07/16/01)
• Re: telecon(s) next week Mike Dean (07/17/01)
• [Brian McBride: Re: Coordination points between RDF(S) and DAML+OIL] Mike Dean (07/18/01)
• Re: DAML RULES -- logic programs, Webizing, RuleML new release (resend) pat hayes (07/18/01)
• Re: telecon(s) next week Mike Dean (07/20/01)
• Re: telecon(s) next week Deborah McGuinness (07/20/01)
• Re: telecon(s) next week Deborah McGuinness (07/20/01)
• Re: telecon(s) next week Deborah McGuinness (07/20/01)
• Joint Committee telecon today 24 July Mike Dean (07/24/01)
• pls fix daml+oil-index [Fwd: N3 version of daml+oil.daml (KIF version, too)] Dan Connolly (07/24/01)
• Re: pls fix daml+oil-index [Fwd: N3 version of daml+oil.daml (KIF version, too)] Mike Dean (07/24/01)
• Re: pls fix daml+oil-index [Fwd: N3 version of daml+oil.daml (KIF version, too)] Dan Connolly (07/24/01)
• Re: Joint Committee telecon today 24 July Peter F. Patel-Schneider (07/24/01)
• Re: pls fix daml+oil-index [Fwd: N3 version of daml+oil.daml (KIF version, too)] Jim Hendler (07/24/01)
• no Joint Committee telecon 31 July Mike Dean (07/31/01)
• yet another rules proposal Mike Dean (08/03/01)
• no Joint Committee telecon 7 August Mike Dean (08/06/01)
• Joint Committee telecon tomorrow 14 August Mike Dean (08/13/01)
• Re: Joint Committee telecon tomorrow 14 August Dan Connolly (08/13/01)
• Re: Joint Committee telecon tomorrow 14 August Mike Dean (08/13/01)
• Joint Committee Minutes August 14 Mike Dean (08/14/01)
• who holds copyright on DAML+OIL? Dan Connolly (08/15/01)
• Re: who holds copyright on DAML+OIL? Dan Connolly (08/15/01)
• Re: who holds copyright on DAML+OIL? Mike Dean (08/16/01)
• Re: who holds copyright on DAML+OIL? Deborah McGuinness (08/16/01)
• draft: Combining Rules with Ontologies for the Semantic Web Benjamin Grosof (08/16/01)
• Re: who holds copyright on DAML+OIL? Jim Hendler (08/16/01)
• Re: URGENT: please post: draft: Combining Rules with Ontologies for the Semantic Web Mike Dean (08/18/01)
• Joint Committee telecon tomorrow 21 August Mike Dean (08/20/01)
• daml+oil syntax checker Ian Horrocks (08/22/01)
• Strawman DAML+OIL Query Language Proposal Richard Fikes (08/22/01)
• Re: Strawman DAML+OIL Query Language Proposal Harold Boley (08/23/01)
• Fwd: DAML+OIL W3C Note Jim Hendler (08/24/01)
• Re: Fwd: DAML+OIL W3C Note Mike Dean (08/24/01)
• Re: Fwd: DAML+OIL W3C Note Peter F. Patel-Schneider (08/24/01)
• Re: Fwd: DAML+OIL W3C Note Dan Connolly (08/24/01)
• Re: Fwd: DAML+OIL W3C Note Ian Horrocks (08/24/01)
• Joint Committee Minutes August 21 Mike Dean (08/27/01)
• Joint Committee personnel change Jim Hendler (08/27/01)
• Joint Committee telecon today 28 August Mike Dean (08/28/01)
• Re: Joint Committee telecon today 28 August Frank van Harmelen (08/28/01)
• Re: Joint Committee telecon today 28 August Mike Dean (08/28/01)
• Re: Joint Committee telecon today 28 August Deborah McGuinness (08/28/01)
• Re: Joint Committee telecon today 28 August Deborah McGuinness (08/28/01)
• address of message Peter Patel-Schneider (08/28/01)
• submission URL Peter F. Patel-Schneider (08/28/01)
• subclass loops, proper subclasses and so on pat hayes (08/28/01)
• summary: acyclic class hierarchy Frank van Harmelen (08/28/01)
• Re: Strawman DAML+OIL Query Language Proposal Frank van Harmelen (08/28/01)
• summary: Web Ontology WG discussion among AC members Frank van Harmelen (08/28/01)
• Re: subclass loops, proper subclasses and so on Mike Dean (08/28/01)
• Re: subclass loops, proper subclasses and so on Frank van Harmelen (08/28/01)
• Re: Strawman DAML+OIL Query Language Proposal Mike Dean (08/28/01)
• Re: subclass loops, proper subclasses and so on Frank van Harmelen (08/28/01)
• Re: subclass loops, proper subclasses and so on pat hayes (08/28/01)
• Re: subclass loops, proper subclasses and so on pat hayes (08/28/01)
• Re: Strawman DAML+OIL Query Language Proposal Dan Brickley (08/28/01)
• thoughts on the new rdfs:subClassOf Peter F. Patel-Schneider (08/29/01)
• Re: summary: acyclic class hierarchy Peter F. Patel-Schneider (08/29/01)
• Re: thoughts on the new rdfs:subClassOf Dan Connolly (08/29/01)
• Re: subclass loops, proper subclasses and so on Peter F. Patel-Schneider (08/29/01)
• Re: thoughts on the new rdfs:subClassOf Peter F. Patel-Schneider (08/29/01)
• Re: thoughts on the new rdfs:subClassOf pat hayes (08/29/01)
• Re: subclass loops, proper subclasses and so on pat hayes (08/29/01)
• Re: thoughts on the new rdfs:subClassOf Jim Hendler (08/29/01)
• Re: submission URL Mike Dean (08/30/01)
• Re: thoughts on the new rdfs:subClassOf Frank van Harmelen (08/30/01)
• Re: thoughts on the new rdfs:subClassOf Peter F. Patel-Schneider (08/30/01)
• Re: subclass loops, proper subclasses and so on Peter F. Patel-Schneider (08/30/01)
• Re: submission URL Peter F. Patel-Schneider (08/30/01)
• Re: submission URL Dan Connolly (08/30/01)
• Re: submission URL Frank van Harmelen (08/30/01)
• Re: summary: acyclic class hierarchy Ian Horrocks (08/30/01)
• Re: submission URL Deborah McGuinness (08/30/01)
• Re: thoughts on the new rdfs:subClassOf pat hayes (08/30/01)
• Re: subclass loops, proper subclasses and so on pat hayes (08/30/01)
• Re: submission URL Mike Dean (08/30/01)
• Ontologies Containing FOL Axioms Richard Fikes (08/31/01)
• Re: thoughts on the new rdfs:subClassOf pat hayes (08/31/01)
• MIT support for Joint Committee Eric Miller (09/02/01)
• Joint Committee Minutes August 28 Mike Dean (09/03/01)
• Re: DAML bug Mike Dean (09/04/01)
• Joint Committee telecon today 28 August Mike Dean (09/04/01)
• Joint Committee telecon today 4 September (was Re: Joint Committee telecon today 28 August) Mike Dean (09/04/01)
• Re: Strawman DAML+OIL Query Language Proposal Dan Connolly (09/04/01)
• Re: Strawman DAML+OIL Query Language Proposal Dan Connolly (09/04/01)
• Re: Strawman DAML+OIL Query Language Proposal Dan Connolly (09/04/01)
• Re: Strawman DAML+OIL Query Language Proposal Dan Brickley (09/04/01)
• Joint Committee Minutes September 4 Mike Dean (09/05/01)
• Re: DAML bug Ian Horrocks (09/07/01)
• Re: Strawman DAML+OIL Query Language Proposal pat hayes (09/07/01)
• Re: Strawman DAML+OIL Query Language Proposal Peter F. Patel-Schneider (09/07/01)
• DAML for syntax [Strawman DAML+OIL Query...] Dan Connolly (09/07/01)
• Re: Strawman DAML+OIL Query Language Proposal Richard Fikes (09/10/01)
• [no Joint Committee telecon today 11 September] Mike Dean (09/11/01)
• A bump on the DAML+OIL road Peter F. Patel-Schneider (09/12/01)
• Re: A bump on the DAML+OIL road Pat Hayes (09/12/01)
• submission to you-know-what Peter F. Patel-Schneider (09/12/01)
• Re: submission to you-know-what Lynn Andrea Stein (09/12/01)
• Re: submission to you-know-what Peter F. Patel-Schneider (09/12/01)
• Re: submission to you-know-what Lynn Andrea Stein (09/12/01)
• Re: submission to you-know-what Peter F. Patel-Schneider (09/12/01)
• Re: submission to you-know-what Deborah McGuinness (09/12/01)
• Re: submission to you-know-what Pat Hayes (09/12/01)
• Re: submission to you-know-what Deborah McGuinness (09/12/01)
• Re: submission to you-know-what Peter F. Patel-Schneider (09/12/01)
• Re: submission to you-know-what Dan Brickley (09/12/01)
• Re: submission to you-know-what Dan Connolly (09/12/01)
• Re: submission to you-know-what Deborah McGuinness (09/12/01)
• Re: submission to you-know-what Peter F. Patel-Schneider (09/12/01)
• www pointers in submission to you-know-what Peter F. Patel-Schneider (09/13/01)
• Re: submission to you-know-what Peter F. Patel-Schneider (09/13/01)
• w3c submission Deborah McGuinness (09/14/01)
• RDF query languages Frank van Harmelen (09/18/01)
• Joint Committee telecon today 18 September Mike Dean (09/18/01)
• Re: Joint Committee telecon today 18 September Dan Connolly (09/18/01)
• Re: Joint Committee telecon today 18 September Peter F. Patel-Schneider (09/18/01)
• Re: Joint Committee telecon today 18 September Peter F. Patel-Schneider (09/18/01)
• Re: Joint Committee telecon today 18 September Deborah McGuinness (09/18/01)
• Re: Joint Committee telecon today 18 September Dan Brickley (09/18/01)
• Re: Joint Committee telecon today 18 September Peter F. Patel-Schneider (09/18/01)
• Re: Joint Committee telecon today 18 September Deborah McGuinness (09/18/01)
• url for w3c validation Peter F. Patel-Schneider (09/18/01)
• DAML+OIL Query Language and RQL Richard Fikes (09/24/01)
• Information Exchanged During Query-Answering Richard Fikes (09/24/01)
• Re: RDF query languages Mike Dean (09/24/01)
• Joint Committee Minutes September 18 Mike Dean (09/24/01)
• Joint Committee telecon tomorrow 25 September Mike Dean (09/24/01)
• Re: Joint Committee telecon tomorrow 25 September Dan Brickley (09/24/01)
• Re: Information Exchanged During Query-Answering Frank van Harmelen (09/25/01)
• a map to acronym space on query languages & storage devices Frank van Harmelen (09/25/01)
• Re: Information Exchanged During Query-Answering Stefan Decker (09/25/01)
• [Fwd: Re: a map to acronym space on query languages & storage devices] Frank van Harmelen (09/25/01)
• Re: Information Exchanged During Query-Answering Mike Dean (09/25/01)
• Re: DAML+OIL Query Language and RQL Peter F. Patel-Schneider (09/25/01)
• Re: DAML+OIL Query Language and RQL Frank van Harmelen (09/25/01)
• Re: Information Exchanged During Query-Answering Frank van Harmelen (09/25/01)
• Re: a map to acronym space on query languages & storage devices Frank van Harmelen (09/25/01)
• Re: a map to acronym space on query languages & storage devices Mike Dean (09/25/01)
• DAML search/query service by Teknowledge Frank van Harmelen (09/25/01)
• Re: DAML+OIL Query Language and RQL Jim Hendler (09/25/01)
• On Behalf of Deborah McGuinness Brandon Amundson (09/26/01)
• On Behalf of Adam Pease Brandon Amundson (09/26/01)
• problems caused by the delay in the starting of the webont wg Peter F. Patel-Schneider (09/28/01)
• an RDFS-aware model theory for DAML+OIL Peter F. Patel-Schneider (09/28/01)
• including labels and comments in the ``definition'' of DAML+OIL Peter F. Patel-Schneider (09/29/01)
• more on daml+oil.daml Peter F. Patel-Schneider (09/29/01)
• updated new model theory Peter F. Patel-Schneider (09/29/01)
• proposed agenda item for this week's meeting Peter F. Patel-Schneider (10/01/01)
• comments on proposed agenda items Peter F. Patel-Schneider (10/01/01)
• XML schema and RDF datatypes [was: comments...] Dan Connolly (10/01/01)
• Joint Committee Minutes September 25 Mike Dean (10/02/01)
• Joint Committee telecon today 2 October Mike Dean (10/02/01)
• Re: XML schema and RDF datatypes [was: comments...] Pat Hayes (10/02/01)
• Re: XML schema and RDF datatypes [was: comments...] Peter F. Patel-Schneider (10/02/01)
• Re: XML schema and RDF datatypes [was: comments...] Pat Hayes (10/02/01)
• Re: XML schema and RDF datatypes [was: comments...] Dan Connolly (10/02/01)
• Re: including labels and comments in the ``definition'' of DAML+OIL Dan Connolly (10/02/01)
• Re: more on daml+oil.daml Dan Connolly (10/02/01)
• Re: updated new model theory Dan Connolly (10/02/01)
• Re: XML schema and RDF datatypes [was: comments...] Peter F. Patel-Schneider (10/02/01)
• Re: more on daml+oil.daml Peter F. Patel-Schneider (10/02/01)
• new model theory for DAML+OIL Peter F. Patel-Schneider (10/02/01)
• Re: updated new model theory Dan Brickley (10/02/01)
• Joint Committee Minutes October 2 Mike Dean (10/02/01)
• more thoughts on daml+oil.daml Peter F. Patel-Schneider (10/03/01)
• Re: more thoughts on daml+oil.daml Dan Connolly (10/03/01)
• datatypes and RDF Schema Peter F. Patel-Schneider (10/04/01)
• Re: datatypes and RDF Schema Dan Connolly (10/04/01)
• Qnames in RDF [was Re: datatypes and RDF Schema} Jeff Heflin (10/04/01)
• Re: datatypes and RDF Schema Pat Hayes (10/04/01)
• Re: datatypes and RDF Schema Pat Hayes (10/04/01)
• Re: new model theory for DAML+OIL Pat Hayes (10/04/01)
• Re: Qnames in RDF [was Re: datatypes and RDF Schema} Dan Connolly (10/04/01)
• Re: new model theory for DAML+OIL Peter F. Patel-Schneider (10/04/01)
• Re: datatypes and RDF Schema Peter F. Patel-Schneider (10/04/01)
• Re: datatypes and RDF Schema Peter F. Patel-Schneider (10/04/01)
• Re: more thoughts on daml+oil.daml Frank van Harmelen (10/05/01)
• two documents concerning datatypes in RDFS Peter F. Patel-Schneider (10/08/01)
• Re: more thoughts on daml+oil.daml Peter F. Patel-Schneider (10/08/01)
• Re: new model theory for DAML+OIL Pat Hayes (10/08/01)
• Re: datatypes and RDF Schema Pat Hayes (10/08/01)
• Re: new model theory for DAML+OIL Peter F. Patel-Schneider (10/08/01)
• Re: datatypes and RDF Schema Peter F. Patel-Schneider (10/08/01)
• Joint Committee telecon tomorrow 9 October Mike Dean (10/08/01)
• Re: new model theory for DAML+OIL Pat Hayes (10/08/01)
• Re: more thoughts on daml+oil.daml Ian Horrocks (10/08/01)
• Re: datatypes and RDF Schema Pat Hayes (10/08/01)
• Re: more thoughts on daml+oil.daml Peter F. Patel-Schneider (10/09/01)
• Re: datatypes and RDF Schema Peter F. Patel-Schneider (10/09/01)
• Re: datatypes and RDF Schema Dan Connolly (10/09/01)
• Re: new model theory for DAML+OIL Peter F. Patel-Schneider (10/09/01)
• Re: datatypes and RDF Schema Pat Hayes (10/09/01)
• EU/NSF meeting Frank van Harmelen (10/09/01)
• US/EU Meeting... Stefan Decker (10/09/01)
• Re: US/EU Meeting... Dan Connolly (10/09/01)
• Re: US/EU Meeting... Stefan Decker (10/09/01)
• Semantic Web Class Jeff Heflin (10/09/01)
• General Semantic Web talk material Frank van Harmelen (10/09/01)
• Re: Semantic Web Class Frank van Harmelen (10/09/01)
• Re: more thoughts on daml+oil.daml Peter F. Patel-Schneider (10/09/01)
• Re: General Semantic Web talk material Richard Fikes (10/09/01)
• Re: Semantic Web Class Richard Fikes (10/09/01)
• Re: new model theory for DAML+OIL Peter F. Patel-Schneider (10/10/01)
• model theory and literals Pat Hayes (10/10/01)
• Re: model theory and literals Peter F. Patel-Schneider (10/10/01)
• Re: new model theory for DAML+OIL Pat Hayes (10/10/01)
• Re: model theory and literals Pat Hayes (10/10/01)
• Re: new model theory for DAML+OIL Peter F. Patel-Schneider (10/10/01)
• Re: Semantic Web Class Jim Hendler (10/10/01)
• Re: new model theory for DAML+OIL Pat Hayes (10/10/01)
• Re: new model theory for DAML+OIL Peter F. Patel-Schneider (10/11/01)
• Re: new model theory for DAML+OIL Peter F. Patel-Schneider (10/11/01)
• XML Query data model, algebra, and stuff Dan Connolly (10/11/01)
• Can XQuery do RDF Query? DAML Query? Dan Connolly (10/11/01)
• Re: new model theory for DAML+OIL Peter F. Patel-Schneider (10/11/01)
• Re: new model theory for DAML+OIL Dan Connolly (10/11/01)
• Re: new model theory for DAML+OIL Pat Hayes (10/11/01)
• Re: XML Query data model, algebra, and stuff Peter F. Patel-Schneider (10/12/01)
• Re: XML Query data model, algebra, and stuff Pat Hayes (10/12/01)
• a new way of thinking about RDF and RDF Schema Peter F. Patel-Schneider (10/12/01)
• webont status at next meeting Peter F. Patel-Schneider (10/12/01)
• Re: webont status at next meeting Jim Hendler (10/12/01)
• Tonight's teleconf Ian Horrocks (10/16/01)
• apologies Pat Hayes (10/16/01)
• Joint Committee Minutes October 9 Mike Dean (10/16/01)
• Joint Committee telecon today 16 October Mike Dean (10/16/01)
• XML/RDF model theory Peter F. Patel-Schneider (10/16/01)
• Fw: Re: DAML+OIL submission to W3C (copyright/patent) Peter F. Patel-Schneider (10/17/01)
• RDF processor Peter F. Patel-Schneider (10/18/01)
• Re: Fw: Re: DAML+OIL submission to W3C (copyright/patent) Jim Hendler (10/18/01)
• Re: Fw: Re: DAML+OIL submission to W3C (copyright/patent) Peter F. Patel-Schneider (10/18/01)
• Re: DAML+OIL submission to W3C (copyright/patent) Peter F. Patel-Schneider (10/18/01)
• Re: Fw: Re: DAML+OIL submission to W3C (copyright/patent) Deborah McGuinness (10/18/01)
• Re: DAML+OIL submission to W3C (copyright/patent) Deborah McGuinness (10/18/01)
• Re: Fw: Re: DAML+OIL submission to W3C (copyright/patent) Dan Connolly (10/18/01)
• Re: Fw: Re: DAML+OIL submission to W3C (copyright/patent) Dan Connolly (10/18/01)
• Re: Fw: Re: DAML+OIL submission to W3C (copyright/patent) Deborah McGuinness (10/18/01)
• Re: Fw: Re: DAML+OIL submission to W3C (copyright/patent) Dan Connolly (10/20/01)
• Re: Fw: Re: DAML+OIL submission to W3C (copyright/patent) Peter F. Patel-Schneider (10/20/01)
• Re: Fw: Re: DAML+OIL submission to W3C (copyright/patent) Dan Connolly (10/20/01)
• on behalf of Jim Hendler Joseph Coffman (10/22/01)
• Re: Fw: Re: DAML+OIL submission to W3C (copyright/patent) Pat Hayes (10/22/01)
• Re: Fw: Re: DAML+OIL submission to W3C (copyright/patent) Jim Hendler (10/22/01)
• Re: Fw: Re: DAML+OIL submission to W3C (copyright/patent) Frank van Harmelen (10/23/01)
• Re: Fw: Re: DAML+OIL submission to W3C (copyright/patent) Peter F. Patel-Schneider (10/23/01)
• Re: ordered combination of XML and RDF Peter F. Patel-Schneider (10/23/01)
• Re: ordered combination of XML and RDF Mike Dean (10/23/01)
• Re: ordered combination of XML and RDF Peter F. Patel-Schneider (10/23/01)
• Joint Committee Minutes October 16 Mike Dean (10/23/01)
• Joint Committee telecon today 23 October Mike Dean (10/23/01)
• Re: Fw: Re: DAML+OIL submission to W3C (copyright/patent) Deborah McGuinness (10/23/01)
• on behalf of sandro Joseph Coffman (10/24/01)
• Re: what should the result of query be (and look like) Peter F. Patel-Schneider (10/24/01)
• Re: what should the result of query be (and look like) Sandro Hawke (10/24/01)
• Re: on behalf of sandro Pat Hayes (10/24/01)
• Re: what should the result of query be (and look like) Pat Hayes (10/24/01)
• Re: on behalf of sandro Richard Fikes (10/24/01)
• Re: on behalf of sandro Deborah McGuinness (10/24/01)
• Re: on behalf of sandro Sandro Hawke (10/24/01)
• Re: on behalf of sandro Richard Fikes (10/24/01)
• Re: on behalf of sandro Deborah McGuinness (10/24/01)
• Re: on behalf of sandro Richard Fikes (10/24/01)
• Re: on behalf of sandro Deborah McGuinness (10/24/01)
• existential answers to queries (was: Re: on behalf of sandro) Pat Hayes (10/24/01)
• Re: existential answers to queries (was: Re: on behalf of sandro) Deborah McGuinness (10/24/01)
• Re: on behalf of sandro Ian Horrocks (10/25/01)
• Re: existential answers to queries (was: Re: on behalf of sandro) Ian Horrocks (10/25/01)
• Re: on behalf of sandro Pat Hayes (10/24/01)
• Re: existential answers to queries (was: Re: on behalf of sandro) Richard Fikes (10/24/01)
• Re: on behalf of sandro Richard Fikes (10/24/01)
• Re: existential answers to queries (was: Re: on behalf of sandro) Deborah McGuinness (10/25/01)
• Re: on behalf of sandro (fwd) Ian Horrocks (10/25/01)
• Re: on behalf of sandro (fwd) Ian Horrocks (10/25/01)