Re: thoughts on the new rdfs:subClassOf

From: Dan Connolly (
Date: 08/29/01

"Peter F. Patel-Schneider" wrote:
> Here are some thoughts on rdfs:subClassOf.
> peter
>         Notes on the new definition of rdfs:subClassOf
> The RDF Core working group has modified the definition of rdfs:subClassOf
> to indicate that rdfs:subClassOf means proper subclass.

I don't believe that's actually the case. I'm certainly
not party to any such decision.

Have you guys seen any record of this decision?

Dan Connolly, W3C

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : 04/02/02 EST