Re: thoughts on the new rdfs:subClassOf

From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider (pfps@research.bell-labs.com)
Date: 08/29/01

• Next message: pat hayes: "Re: thoughts on the new rdfs:subClassOf"
• Previous message: Peter F. Patel-Schneider: "Re: subclass loops, proper subclasses and so on"
• In reply to: Dan Connolly: "Re: thoughts on the new rdfs:subClassOf"
• Next in thread: pat hayes: "Re: thoughts on the new rdfs:subClassOf"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

I may have been mistaken about this.  (I was going by my remembrance of
what Pat said, and by what is in his model theory document.)

peter



From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Subject: Re: thoughts on the new rdfs:subClassOf
Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2001 12:46:22 -0500

> "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" wrote:
> > 
> > Here are some thoughts on rdfs:subClassOf.
> > 
> > peter
> > 
> >         Notes on the new definition of rdfs:subClassOf
> > 
> > The RDF Core working group has modified the definition of rdfs:subClassOf
> > to indicate that rdfs:subClassOf means proper subclass.
> 
> I don't believe that's actually the case. I'm certainly
> not party to any such decision.
> 
> Have you guys seen any record of this decision?
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/

• Next message: pat hayes: "Re: thoughts on the new rdfs:subClassOf"
• Previous message: Peter F. Patel-Schneider: "Re: subclass loops, proper subclasses and so on"
• In reply to: Dan Connolly: "Re: thoughts on the new rdfs:subClassOf"
• Next in thread: pat hayes: "Re: thoughts on the new rdfs:subClassOf"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : 04/02/02 EST