From: Dan Brickley (danbri@w3.org)
Date: 10/02/01
On Tue, 2 Oct 2001, Dan Connolly wrote:
> "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" wrote:
> [...]
> > Name: daml+oil-model.html
>
> | The datatype domain LV (called literals in RDF) for DAML+OIL is a
> | set consisting of the (disjoint?) union of the value spaces of
> | the primitive XML Schema data types.
>
> Yes, the value spaces of the XML schema primitive datatypes are
> mutually disjoint. Somebody just confirmed this for me the other
> day...
Interesting. Do you know if there are any plans to extend
http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-formal/ ("XML Schema: Formal Description")
to cover Schema part 2., datatypes, in the near futures?
http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-formal/
[[
XML Schema: Formal Description is a formal description of XML types and
validity as specified by XML Schema Part 1: Structures.
[...]
In particular, future versions will incorporate some or all of the
XML Schema Part 2: Datatypes specification
]]
Currently all we have is http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-formal/#section-structures-datatypes
...it'd be very interesting to see Schema part 2 given the full treatment.
http://www.w3.org/XML/Activity.html#future doesn't give much information
on expected timescales for formalisation of datatypes. Perhaps it would
help to send them encouraging noises from the DAML and RDF groups?
Dan
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : 04/02/02 EST