Re: followup from telecon (integration of XML and RDF)

From: Dan Connolly (
Date: 11/20/01

"Peter F. Patel-Schneider" wrote:
> 2/ parsetype, as this is not good XML.  (parsetype=literal is not needed,
>    in any case, here.)

What's wrong with rdf:parseYype="Literal"?

It's perfectly good XML. Please don't spread misinformation.

If you mean that you don't like it, please say so more plainly.

Dan Connolly, W3C

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : 04/02/02 EST