Re: SWRL updates

From: Ian Horrocks ([email protected])
Date: 11/14/03

  • Next message: Harold Boley: "Re: SWRL updates"
    Mike,
    
    I updated section 3 to be a little more detailed/precise and to be
    more consistent with the latest S&AS.
    
    Otherwise, looks good.
    
    Ian
    
    
    On November 14, Mike Dean writes:
    > In the interest of closure, I made the following changes to
    > [1]
    > 
    >   updated the namespaces in sections 5 and 6 to use swrl[x],
    >   owl[x], and ruleml.  After some consideration, I also
    >   decided to add the namespaces to the XML productions, for
    >   clarity.
    > 
    >   updated the text at the beginning of section 5 as
    >   suggested by Harold
    > 
    >   fixed several instances of non-well-formed XML in section
    >   5, replacing for example
    >   <owlx:class="&airport-ont;Airport" /> with <owlx:Class
    >   owlx:name="&airport-ont;Airport" />
    > 
    >   renamed section 6 to RDF Concrete Syntax and included
    >   links to both
    >   the RDF Schema and OWL Ontology (for now, anyway)
    > 
    >   updated the title, authors, and date
    > 
    > Any complaints or suggestions?  Does anyone anticipate any
    > more updates before we accept the current document on
    > Tuesday?
    > 
    > 	Mike
    > 
    > [1] http://www.daml.org/rules/proposal/
    


    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : 11/14/03 EST