Re: new syntax for datatypes

From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider (pfps@research.bell-labs.com)
Date: 02/16/01

Next message: Dan Connolly: "Re: URIs for primitive datatypes and facets?"
Previous message: Ian Horrocks: "Re: new syntax for datatypes"
In reply to: Dan Connolly: "Re: new syntax for datatypes"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Not to get into a discussion on this issue, but why can't you have XML
Schema stuff and RDF stuff in the same document?  They are within their own
begin/end pairs, after all?

peter

Next message: Dan Connolly: "Re: URIs for primitive datatypes and facets?"
Previous message: Ian Horrocks: "Re: new syntax for datatypes"
In reply to: Dan Connolly: "Re: new syntax for datatypes"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : 04/02/02 EST