From: Jim Hendler (james.hendler@verizon.net)
Date: 11/08/01
At 4:39 PM -0800 11/8/01, Deborah McGuinness wrote: >that is doable. >there will be a number of daml:foo s and they will have a lot of arguments >and a lot of implications thus the english description of them will not be >compact but doable. > >I guess then i should add a request to what i said people might send me - a >proposed daml syntax for the new request as well. >i am not expecting any one person to send everything but eventually we want >to fill in the template. > >And on the notion of DAML+OIL layers, I would claim that we will put the >daml:foos in a non-core layer. >While we at stanford will want to update our daml parsers to understand the >fancy foo's we dont want to break all of the existing tools every time we >add a new foo. >while the daml+oil core may find a fair amount of stability, i expect the >foos to keep growing. > >d from a joint committee perspective that's fine. From a WG perspective, we are trying to finalize a proposal - I don't think we will propose layers, unless there is a compelling reason to do so. What we are trying to propose is the core. -- Professor James Hendler hendler@cs.umd.edu Director, Semantic Web and Agent Technologies 301-405-2696 Maryland Information and Network Dynamics Lab. 301-405-6707 (Fax) AV Williams Building, Univ of Maryland College Park, MD 20742 http://www.cs.umd.edu/users/hendler
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : 04/02/02 EST