From: Pat Hayes (phayes@ai.uwf.edu)
Date: 10/09/01
>From: Pat Hayes <phayes@ai.uwf.edu> >Subject: Re: datatypes and RDF Schema >Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2001 18:57:09 -0500 > >> >> BTW, re. your recent rants about communication. This issue is being >> discussed simultaneously both here and on RDF-core, and I'm sure it >> would be extremely useful if the discussions could be integrated. > >I do not believe that I can post to that mailing list. Can I? But you can read it and I can post to it :-) > >> Take a look at the rdfcore email archive this month under 'big >> issue', I'd be very interested on your (or anyone else's) comments on >> this stuff, particularly on >> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2001Oct/0076.html. > >There are lots of possible ways to go with ``literals''. > >One important forcing function, and one that appears to be getting >completely insufficient attention in the RDF Core WG, is > > What does XML/XML Schema do? > >This forcing function, and the related, > > What do RDF users do? > >were behind some of the decisions made for DAML+OIL datatypes. > >If you don't need to abide by either of the above, then there is much less >reason to use the more-complex machinery in DAML+OIL datatypes and in my >recent proposal. > >> Pat > >peter > >PS: Does anyone know how to elevate this issue to joint RDF/XML/DAML+OIL >consideration? Is the Semantic Web Coordination Group the right place? For the nonce, why don't I just CC these messages to the WG until they tell me to stop. Hence the cross-posting, guys. Pat -- --------------------------------------------------------------------- IHMC (850)434 8903 home 40 South Alcaniz St. (850)202 4416 office Pensacola, FL 32501 (850)202 4440 fax phayes@ai.uwf.edu http://www.coginst.uwf.edu/~phayes
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : 04/02/02 EST