From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider (email@example.com)
Frank mentioned that one possibility for DAML+OIL was to be a language for ``universal use''. I strongly agree with Ian that that was *not* our charter. Further, I would be interested in seeing if anyone has either 1/ a language that is intended for such ``universal use'', or 2/ requirements that such a language should meet. peter PS: By the way, any answer to 1/ would necessarily include an answer to 2/.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : 04/02/02 EST