From: Dan Connolly (connolly@w3.org)
Date: 12/18/01
On Tue, 2001-12-18 at 17:28, Mike Dean wrote: > > With thanks to Peter and all the folks that did > > all the detailed work to get this to happen, > > I bring to your attention... > > > > "DAML+OIL Web Ontology Language > > What a nice holiday present! Thanks for the good news! > > > http://www.w3.org/Submission/2001/12/ > > Is this the final URL, or will it later move to > http://www.w3.org/TR/...? that's the final address of the submission request, yes; As I said, the tech reports themselves are... > title: DAML+OIL (March 2001) reference description > http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/NOTE-daml+oil-reference-20011218 > > title: A Model-Theoretic Semantics for DAML+OIL (March 2001) > http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/NOTE-daml+oil-model-20011218 > > title: An Axiomatic Semantics for RDF, RDF-S, and DAML+OIL (March 2001) > http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/NOTE-daml+oil-axioms-20011218 > > title: Annotated DAML+OIL Ontology Markup > http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/NOTE-daml+oil-walkthru-20011218/ > > One noteable technical side-effect of republication > > is a new namespace name. > > I'm concerned that this will unnecessarily confuse users and > tools. Did I miss this point earlier? Perhaps. It was one of a blizzard of details... > Why is a new > namespace needed? It's one of our publication requirements; part of our commitment to persistence. cf http://www.w3.org/1999/10/nsuri We're looking at relaxing the constraint... allowing other domains, provided the domain holder has signed http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Persistence but I didn't want to hold up this submission while we worked all that out. It took long enough as it is... -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : 04/02/02 EST