Re: DAML+OIL submitted to W3C

From: Mike Dean (
Date: 12/18/01

> With thanks to Peter and all the folks that did
> all the detailed work to get this to happen,
> I bring to your attention...
> "DAML+OIL Web Ontology Language

What a nice holiday present!  Thanks for the good news!


Is this the final URL, or will it later move to

> One noteable technical side-effect of republication
> is a new namespace name.

I'm concerned that this will unnecessarily confuse users and
tools.  Did I miss this point earlier?  Why is a new
namespace needed?


This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : 04/02/02 EST