Re: DAML+OIL submitted to W3C

From: Mike Dean (mdean@bbn.com)
Date: 12/18/01

Next message: Frank van Harmelen: "Re: DAML+OIL submitted to W3C"
Previous message: Mike Dean: "Joint Committee telecon today 18 December"
Next in thread: Frank van Harmelen: "Re: DAML+OIL submitted to W3C"
Reply: Frank van Harmelen: "Re: DAML+OIL submitted to W3C"
Reply: Dan Connolly: "Re: DAML+OIL submitted to W3C"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

> With thanks to Peter and all the folks that did
> all the detailed work to get this to happen,
> I bring to your attention...
> 
> "DAML+OIL Web Ontology Language

What a nice holiday present!  Thanks for the good news!

> http://www.w3.org/Submission/2001/12/

Is this the final URL, or will it later move to
http://www.w3.org/TR/...?

> One noteable technical side-effect of republication
> is a new namespace name.

I'm concerned that this will unnecessarily confuse users and
tools.  Did I miss this point earlier?  Why is a new
namespace needed?

	Mike

Next message: Frank van Harmelen: "Re: DAML+OIL submitted to W3C"
Previous message: Mike Dean: "Joint Committee telecon today 18 December"
Next in thread: Frank van Harmelen: "Re: DAML+OIL submitted to W3C"
Reply: Frank van Harmelen: "Re: DAML+OIL submitted to W3C"
Reply: Dan Connolly: "Re: DAML+OIL submitted to W3C"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : 04/02/02 EST