From: Frank van Harmelen (Frank.van.Harmelen@cs.vu.nl)
Date: 03/21/01
Mike Dean wrote: > > > I also uploaded a revised walkthrough document. > > [1] and [2] have been updated. Thanks! > > Mike > > [1] http://www.daml.org/2001/03/reference.html > > [2] http://www.daml.org/2001/03/daml+oil-walkthru.html I received the following email, which seems useful to fix. Frank. --- Subject: DAML case sensitivity Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2001 11:52:27 -0500 (EST) From: Vera Zaychik <uvzaychi@mcs.drexel.edu> To: Frank.van.Harmelen@cs.vu.nl Hello, I apologize for emailing you directly instead of the whole list but I am not on any of the DAML lists, plus this is just report of a glitch in the example ontology. In several places cardinality properties are spelled all lower-case (i.e. maxcardinality), while they are actually defined as maxCardinality/minCardinality. I thought that RDF is case sensitive and thus expected DAML to be such as well. I assume this was just a small glitch overlooked. I have many other questions like this (ones of a naive user). Sincerely, Vera Zaychik Drexel University Philadelphia, PA
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : 04/02/02 EST