Re: one thing to agitate for at the RDF meeting

From: Jeff Heflin (
Date: 02/22/01

I agree, the lack of the ability to use namespaces in attribute names
makes RDF syntax look exceedingly unelegant. A possible solution would
be to define a namespace protocol ns, so that you could have URIs like:



"Peter F. Patel-Schneider" wrote:
> Hi:
> I would like for one the points that are brought up at the RDF meeting
> next week to be that XML namespaces can be used in resource names.  It is
> exceedingly silly to state a bunch of namespace definitions only to have to
> revert to the long name in most places.
> peter

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : 04/02/02 EST