Re: Pre-final release versions available

From: Frank van Harmelen (frankh@cs.vu.nl)
Date: 01/11/01

Next message: Frank van Harmelen: "Re: DAML+OIL release"
Previous message: Stefan Decker: "Re: [on the value of RDF]"
In reply to: Peter F. Patel-Schneider: "Re: Pre-final release versions available"
Next in thread: Deborah Mcguinness: "Re: Pre-final release versions available"
Reply: Deborah Mcguinness: "Re: Pre-final release versions available"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

"Peter F. Patel-Schneider" wrote:

> A more substantive comment:  It is not really true that DAML+OIL does not
> have any semantics for arbitrary RDF triples.  In fact DAML+OIL provides
> (perhaps) the first real semantics for such triples.  It it just that the
> semantics provided is just the obvious one---that the interpretation of
> the subject is related to the interpretation of the object by the
> interpretation of the predicate.  This is sort of implied by the mixing note.

I've removed the word "only", so that the sentence now says:

"As stated above, DAML+OIL assigns a specific meaning
 to certain RDF triples."

whereas it used to say:

"As stated above, DAML+OIL assigns a specific meaning 
 only to certain RDF triples.

This, plus the comment in the note make the text sufficiently correct, I think. 

Frank.
   ----

Next message: Frank van Harmelen: "Re: DAML+OIL release"
Previous message: Stefan Decker: "Re: [on the value of RDF]"
In reply to: Peter F. Patel-Schneider: "Re: Pre-final release versions available"
Next in thread: Deborah Mcguinness: "Re: Pre-final release versions available"
Reply: Deborah Mcguinness: "Re: Pre-final release versions available"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : 04/02/02 EST