Re: Pre-final release versions available

From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider (pfps@research.bell-labs.com)
Date: 01/10/01

• Next message: Deborah Mcguinness: "Re: Pre-final release versions available"
• Previous message: Frank van Harmelen: "Pre-final release versions available"
• In reply to: Frank van Harmelen: "Pre-final release versions available"
• Next in thread: Frank van Harmelen: "Re: Pre-final release versions available"
• Reply: Frank van Harmelen: "Re: Pre-final release versions available"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

A (very) picky comment:  ``note'' should be captialized in the sentences
that talk about an alternative for domain and range restrictions.

A more substantive comment:  It is not really true that DAML+OIL does not
have any semantics for arbitrary RDF triples.  In fact DAML+OIL provides
(perhaps) the first real semantics for such triples.  It it just that the
semantics provided is just the obvious one---that the interpretation of
the subject is related to the interpretation of the object by the
interpretation of the predicate.  This is sort of implied by the mixing note.

peter

• Next message: Deborah Mcguinness: "Re: Pre-final release versions available"
• Previous message: Frank van Harmelen: "Pre-final release versions available"
• In reply to: Frank van Harmelen: "Pre-final release versions available"
• Next in thread: Frank van Harmelen: "Re: Pre-final release versions available"
• Reply: Frank van Harmelen: "Re: Pre-final release versions available"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : 04/02/02 EST