From: Dan Brickley (danbri@w3.org)
Date: 09/24/01
(+cc: brian mcbride, rdfcore co-chair) On Mon, 24 Sep 2001, Mike Dean wrote: > We'll have our weekly telecon tomorrow (September 25) from > 4-5pm EDT, 1-2pm PDT, and corresponding times in other > locations. > > The dial-in numbers are > > U.S.: 800-298-9646 > > outside U.S.: +1-904-779-4740 > > If you're asked, the chairperson is Jack Cater (one of my > coworkers). > > A parallel logged IRC session will be available on the > #joint-committee channel at irc.daml.org (see > https://www.daml.org/irc/ for the server password). > > Below is a draft agenda; additions are welcome. > > Mike > > agenda updates/additions > > announcements > > minutes from September 18 > > any updates on submission > > query > > RDQL (Frank, Mike, et al) > > DQL and RQL (Richard) [2] (nice summary from Richard; FWIW I agree with Richard's analysis of RDL 'vs' DQL, and think this is consistent with the way the SquishQL work is going) > Information Exchanged During Query-Answering [3] > > RDF Core WG (Pat, Mike, Ora, et al) > > has officially dropped prohibition against cycles in > subClassOf and subPropertyOf A pedantic qualification: while we (rdfcore) agreed last week that the WG should drop the prohibition against subClassOf cycles, we weren't 100% clear about whether this also applies to subPropertyOf. My expecation is that we meant to drop both, and that this will be clarified in our next meeting (friday). I should also emphasise that "officially dropped" may be an overstatement in that we can at this stage only talk about the views of the Working Group, not W3C as a whole. Our decisions, specs etc haven't yet received review by the rest of W3C. That said, I do think these restrictions will be dropped. Dan > > Is "daml:collection" a string or a QName? If the latter, > to which namespace does it refer? > > next week > > TBD > > [1] http://www.daml.org/committee/minutes/2001-09-18.html > > [2] http://www.daml.org/listarchive/joint-committee/0665.html > > [3] http://www.daml.org/listarchive/joint-committee/0666.html >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : 04/02/02 EST