Re: DAML briefing to RDF IG

From: Stefan Decker (stefan@db.stanford.edu)
Date: 02/26/01

Next message: Mike Dean: "Joint Committee telecon today 27 February"
Previous message: Peter F. Patel-Schneider: "Re: DAML briefing to RDF IG"
In reply to: Mike Dean: "DAML briefing to RDF IG"
Next in thread: pat hayes: "Re: DAML briefing to RDF IG"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Hi Mike,

is there a lifecycle picture on the Web?
This could be useful to clarify the overall
DAML approach.

Also it might be useful to point people to the current Protege version,
which is somewhat also a DAML result.

CU,
         Stefan

At 12:55 AM 2/26/2001 -0500, Mike Dean wrote:
>A draft of my briefing (scheduled for Monday at 1145-1230
>EST) to the RDF Interest Group [1] is now available [2].
>I'd particularly appreciate any quick feedback on my new
>language feature matrix [3].
>
>Thanks!
>
>         Mike
>
>[1] http://www.w3.org/2001/02/rdfig-f2f/
>
>[2] http://www.daml.org/2001/02/rdfig-f2f/Overview.html
>
>[3] http://www.daml.org/language/features.html

Next message: Mike Dean: "Joint Committee telecon today 27 February"
Previous message: Peter F. Patel-Schneider: "Re: DAML briefing to RDF IG"
In reply to: Mike Dean: "DAML briefing to RDF IG"
Next in thread: pat hayes: "Re: DAML briefing to RDF IG"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : 04/02/02 EST