Re: SWRL levels

From: Sandro Hawke (sandro@w3.org)
Date: 11/17/05

Next message: miyashita: "特別優待ご案内！報酬２５万☆必読☆"

Previous message: Mike Dean: "RE: SWRL levels"
In reply to: Frank van Harmelen: "Re: SWRL levels"
Next in thread: Mike Dean: "RE: SWRL levels"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

> Ora Lassila said the following:
> > I have the same concerns, plus I worry that the more levels/layers/variants
> > we create, the more confusing this gets for most people (incompatibilities
> > or no incompatibilities).
> 
> I remember well the uphill battle we had to convince the W3C staff 
> (including Tim) that we wanted different flavours of OWL (well, some of 
> us, anyway:-). I would be surprised if they were now open to a whole 
> stack of rule-language varieties?

It should be interesting to see how this all gets worked out in Phase
2 of the RIFWG.   We should be able to avoid these questions for Phase
1, though.

    -- sandro

Next message: miyashita: "特別優待ご案内！報酬２５万☆必読☆"
Previous message: Mike Dean: "RE: SWRL levels"
In reply to: Frank van Harmelen: "Re: SWRL levels"
Next in thread: Mike Dean: "RE: SWRL levels"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : 11/17/05 EST