RE: SWRL levels

• Previous message: Debbie Polk: "100's of titles by Win XP Windows & XP Pro starting @ 9.99"
• Maybe in reply to: Mike Dean: "SWRL levels"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This was bounced due to a new email address, which has now been added to the
allowable senders list.

	Mike

From: "Gerd Wagner" <wagnerg@tu-cottbus.de>
To: "'Ian Horrocks'" <horrocks@cs.man.ac.uk>,
	"'Peter F. Patel-Schneider'" <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
Cc: <kifer@cs.stonybrook.edu>, <mdean@bbn.com>,
	<joint-committee@daml.org>
Subject: RE: SWRL levels
Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2005 11:49:44 +0100
Message-ID: <001501c5ea9b$81d186b0$55032b8d@TMGWAGNER>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11
In-Reply-To: <d8aa4a4b3fff9f32f3b99ca92e902ada@cs.man.ac.uk>
Thread-Index: AcXql+JxO4JpsH2fQoe9TbtbfBCz4QAA04GQ
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180
X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS (at smtp2.TU-Cottbus.De)

> > I worry that Tim's view is tending towards a Tower of Babel, i.e., 
> > different languages that *do not* work together because they make 
> > different underlying assumptions.
> 
> I agree - and my worries were not at all relieved by talk of 
> "interlocking" languages, whatever that means.

Don't worry, people work (somehow) together despite having "different
underlying assumptions". We can expect the same for Web agents/applications.

-Gerd

• Next message: Mike Dean: "RE: SWRL levels"
• Previous message: Debbie Polk: "100's of titles by Win XP Windows & XP Pro starting @ 9.99"
• Maybe in reply to: Mike Dean: "SWRL levels"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : 11/17/05 EST