SWRL levels

From: Mike Dean (mdean@bbn.com)
Date: 11/15/05

Next message: Dream: "$B9b3[@hJ'$$%5%]!<%H3NDjOH$r3NJ]CW$7$^$7$?(B"

Previous message: Mike Dean: "no Joint Committee telecon today 15 November"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

It occurred to me that the "two towers" (ontologies and rules) may share
many floors and that many users may prefer to stay within the common base
(for fear of heights or other reasons).  I think this is the focus of [1]
from Tim's ISWC2005 keynote.

To help with this, I think it may be useful to identify additional levels of
SWRL and offer the following starting definitions:

SWRL RDF

  individualPropertyAtom and datavaluedPropertyAtom (property is just 
  rdf:Property), builtinAtom

SWRL RDFS

  classAtom (named classes only), datarangeAtom, individualPropertyAtom, 
  datavaluedPropertyAtom, builtinAtom

SWRL DLP

  current SWRL Member Submission restricted to DLP limitations

SWRL Lite

  current SWRL Member Submission restricted to OWL Lite limitations

SWRL DL

  current SWRL Member Submission (OWL DL semantics)

SWRL Full

  current SWRL Member Submission with OWL Full semantics

SWRL FOL

  current SWRL FOL Member Submission

SWRL RDF, SWRL RDFS, and SWRL DLP are in the common base.

Thoughts?

	Mike

[1] http://www.w3.org/2005/Talks/1110-iswc-tbl/#[12]

Next message: Dream: "$B9b3[@hJ'$$%5%]!<%H3NDjOH$r3NJ]CW$7$^$7$?(B"
Previous message: Mike Dean: "no Joint Committee telecon today 15 November"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : 11/15/05 EST