Re: OWL Rules proposal

From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider (
Date: 10/07/03

  • Next message: Deborah McGuinness: "Re: OWL Rules proposal"
    From: Mike Dean <>
    Subject: Re: OWL Rules proposal 
    Date: Tue, 07 Oct 2003 05:40:25 -0700
    > Would it be reasonable to add an Annotation element to Rule,
    > like we have for Ontology, Class, Variable, etc.?  This
    > would provide at least some means of passing additional
    > information (e.g. URI rule name, priority, etc.) through to
    > a rule engine.
    > 	Mike
    I see no real reason not to do this.  It would be quite easy in the
    abstract syntax.  I'm not sure if the XML presentation syntax has been
    upgraded to annotations, but if it has, then the translation would be
    fairly simple as well.

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : 10/07/03 EST