Re: OWL Rules proposal

From: Deborah McGuinness (
Date: 10/07/03

  • Next message: Ian Horrocks: "Re: OWL Rules proposal"
    i would also use this if it was available for information that i would 
    present with explanations.
    Mike Dean wrote:
    >Would it be reasonable to add an Annotation element to Rule,
    >like we have for Ontology, Class, Variable, etc.?  This
    >would provide at least some means of passing additional
    >information (e.g. URI rule name, priority, etc.) through to
    >a rule engine.
    >	Mike
     Deborah L. McGuinness 
     Knowledge Systems Laboratory 
     Gates Computer Science Building, 2A Room 241 
     Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305-9020 
     (voice) 650 723 9770    (stanford fax) 650 725 5850   (computer fax)  801 705 0941

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : 10/07/03 EST