Re: Concrete types: next steps?

From: Dan Connolly (connolly@w3.org)
Date: 02/01/01

Next message: Dan Connolly: "daml+oil+concrete includes XML Schema syntax? [was: ... next steps?]"
Previous message: Peter F. Patel-Schneider: "Re: Concrete types: next steps?"
In reply to: Dan Connolly: "Re: Concrete types: next steps?"
Next in thread: Jim Hendler: "Re: Concrete types: next steps?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Dan Connolly wrote:
[...]
>   Using XML Schema Datatypes in RDF and DAML+OIL
>   http://www.w3.org/2001/01/ct24
> 
> Tim and I chatted about it yesterday, and I now think I
> know how to fill in the gaps. Oh for an hour or two
> to write and think...

OK... I found the time this morning. Please take a look; the current
version is
$Revision: 1.10 $ of $Date: 2001/02/01 17:49:14 $ by $Author: connolly $ 

I attach a copy for convenience.

-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
office: tel:+1-913-491-0501
pager: mailto:connolly.pager@w3.org
  (put return phone number in from/subject)

Next message: Dan Connolly: "daml+oil+concrete includes XML Schema syntax? [was: ... next steps?]"
Previous message: Peter F. Patel-Schneider: "Re: Concrete types: next steps?"
In reply to: Dan Connolly: "Re: Concrete types: next steps?"
Next in thread: Jim Hendler: "Re: Concrete types: next steps?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : 04/02/02 EST