Fwd: rules features feedback from Cycorp: OWL-Rules extension priorities

From: Benjamin Grosof (bgrosof@MIT.EDU)
Date: 10/17/03

  • Next message: Benjamin Grosof: "technical detail feedback on OWL Rules: truth value for empty consequent"
    fyi, y'all.
    >X-Sieve: CMU Sieve 2.2
    >Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2003 11:09:20 -0500 (CDT)
    >From: Stephen Reed <reed@cyc.com>
    >To: mdean@bbn.com
    >cc: Michael Witbrock <mwitbrock@cyc.com>
    >Subject: OWL-Rules extension priorities
    >X-Spam-Status: NO
    >X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.28 (www . roaringpenguin . com / mimedefang)
    >X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.35
    >Resent-To: bgrosof@mit.edu
    >Resent-Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2003 11:25:24 -0700
    >Resent-From: Mike Dean <mdean@bbn.com>
    >X-Spam-Score: -0.3
    >X-Spam-Flag: NO
    > >From the Cycorp point of view, we desire that priority be given to:
    >1. n-arity properties
    >2. functional expressions
    >These extensions would permit much broader extraction of the knowledge
    >contained in Cyc.
    >Stephen L. Reed                  phone:  512.342.4036
    >Cycorp, Suite 100                  fax:  512.342.4040
    >3721 Executive Center Drive      email:  reed@cyc.com
    >Austin, TX 78731                   web:  http://www.cyc.com
    >          download OpenCyc at http://www.opencyc.org
    Prof. Benjamin Grosof
    Web Technologies for E-Commerce, Business Policies, E-Contracting, Rules, 
    XML, Agents, Semantic Web Services
    MIT Sloan School of Management, Information Technology group
    http://ebusiness.mit.edu/bgrosof or http://www.mit.edu/~bgrosof

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : 10/17/03 EST