From: Stefan Decker (stefan@db.stanford.edu)
Date: 03/13/01
Hi, one proposal for the outstanding issues - it it obvious which systems are able to do inferences with DAML+OIL and upto which extend (soundness, correctness)? If no, it might be worthwhile to collect a number of available inference systems to give folks a starting point for implementations. Thanks and all the best, Stefan At 01:37 PM 3/13/2001 -0500, Mike Dean wrote: >We'll have our weekly telecon today (Tuesday, March 13) >from 4-5pm EST, 1-2pm PST, and corresponding times in other >locations. > >The dial-in numbers are > > U.S.: 888-483-2662 > > outside U.S.: +1-310-312-5889 > > Enter passcode 6428 followed by the # sign > >Below is a draft agenda; additions are welcome. > > Mike > >agenda updates/additions > >announcements > >corrections to minutes from 6 March [1] > >DAML+OIL (March 2001) [2] > > outstanding issues/actions > > final release decision > >W3C RDF Interest Group meeting [3] closing session (Stefan, >Dan, et al) > >Knowledge Technologies 2001 [4] (Dan) > >What should the committee focus on next? > > rules > > tagging/reification > > non-monotonicity > > ... > > >[1] http://www.daml.org/committee/minutes/2001-03-06.html > >[2] http://www.daml.org/2001/03/daml+oil-index.html > >[3] http://www.daml.org/2001/02/rdfig-f2f/Overview.html > >[4] http://www.knowledgetechnologies.net/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : 04/02/02 EST