Re: more thoughts on daml+oil.daml

From: Dan Connolly (
Date: 10/03/01

"Peter F. Patel-Schneider" wrote:
> It occurs to me that we could include more of the ``semantics'' of DAML+OIL
> in daml+oil.daml.  For example, we could do more with lists, perhaps
> something like:
> Comments?

Nifty. Go for it.

Dan Connolly, W3C

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : 04/02/02 EST