Re: more thoughts on daml+oil.daml

From: Dan Connolly (connolly@w3.org)
Date: 10/03/01

Next message: Peter F. Patel-Schneider: "datatypes and RDF Schema"
Previous message: Peter F. Patel-Schneider: "more thoughts on daml+oil.daml"
In reply to: Peter F. Patel-Schneider: "more thoughts on daml+oil.daml"
Next in thread: Frank van Harmelen: "Re: more thoughts on daml+oil.daml"
Reply: Frank van Harmelen: "Re: more thoughts on daml+oil.daml"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

"Peter F. Patel-Schneider" wrote:
> 
> It occurs to me that we could include more of the ``semantics'' of DAML+OIL
> in daml+oil.daml.  For example, we could do more with lists, perhaps
> something like:
[...]
> Comments?

Nifty. Go for it.


-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/

Next message: Peter F. Patel-Schneider: "datatypes and RDF Schema"
Previous message: Peter F. Patel-Schneider: "more thoughts on daml+oil.daml"
In reply to: Peter F. Patel-Schneider: "more thoughts on daml+oil.daml"
Next in thread: Frank van Harmelen: "Re: more thoughts on daml+oil.daml"
Reply: Frank van Harmelen: "Re: more thoughts on daml+oil.daml"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : 04/02/02 EST