suggested tweaks to wording of SWRL FOL document

From: Benjamin Grosof (bgrosof@MIT.EDU)
Date: 11/18/04

  • Next message: Mike Dean: "Joint Committee telecon tomorrow 23 November"
    Hi folks,
    In the first sentence of the abstract of the current SWRL document [1], it says
    "This is a description of a proposed extension of SWRL to handle 
    unary/binary first-order logic."
    I suggest we add "function-free" after "unary/binary", to increase 
    precision and clarity.
    Also, I suggest the title be "Toward" FOL not "To" FOL, cf. the discussion 
    we had about the release announcement.
    Prof. Benjamin Grosof
    Web Technologies for E-Commerce, Business Policies, E-Contracting, Rules, 
    XML, Agents, Semantic Web Services
    MIT Sloan School of Management, Information Technology group or

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : 11/18/04 EST