From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider (pfps@research.bell-labs.com)
Date: 02/01/01
From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org> Subject: Re: Concrete types: next steps? Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2001 17:11:33 -0600 > Frank van Harmelen wrote: > > > > After the teleconf last night, I've tried to summarise the current situation as I perceive it. Perhaps this is useful to find a way forward. > > > > Frank. > > --- > > > > > - Currently the only proposal on the table is > > Er... well.. I don't claim mine is complete, but since > I don't agree that yours is complete either, I suggest I would be very interested in comments indicating where the current proposal is not complete. > that this is also on the table: > > Using XML Schema Datatypes in RDF and DAML+OIL > http://www.w3.org/2001/01/ct24 > > Tim and I chatted about it yesterday, and I now think I > know how to fill in the gaps. Oh for an hour or two > to write and think... >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : 04/02/02 EST