From: Jim Hendler (jhendler@darpa.mil)
Date: 03/08/01
At 1:46 AM +0100 3/9/01, Frank van Harmelen wrote: >Stefan Decker wrote: > >> actually, since Ontologies are electronic artefacts it would make >> sense to deliver Dublin Core metadata with them. >> That means Dublin Core metadata annotations should be part of the >> DAML specifications for Ontologies. >> >> I suggested this a while back for OIL, and I think I makes also >> sense for DAML+OIL. > >I warmly support Mike's proposal and Stefan's comment. >Of course, in Europe we always do what Stefan tells us:-) > >See for instance http://www.ontoknowledge.org/oil/case-studies/CIA-in-OIL.rdf >(and many of the other examples at >http://www.ontoknowledge.org/oil/case-studies/) > >Page 5 of http://www.ontoknowledge.org/oil/downl/oil-whitepaper.pdf >describes what of DC we exploited in OIL. > >Frank. > ---- Let mew share w/you all what I told Mike -- I think that we should not only have the DC stuff used on the page, but should tie it to an ontology in DAML+OIL -- example, we should know that the contributor has to be a person, the publisher an organization, etc. etc. -- this would both demonstrate a good use of Dublin Core, and also show how we can use DAML+OIL to go beyond it -- I also suggest that those contributors who haven't already created home pages with content in D+O, can do so -- and that way our document becomes a good starting place for semantic web tools... -JH -- Prof. James Hendler Program Manager DARPA/ISO 703-696-2238 (phone) 3701 N. Fairfax Dr. 703-696-2201 (Fax) Arlington, VA 22203 jhendler@darpa.mil
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : 04/02/02 EST