Fw: Typos in 'Annotated DAML+OIL Ontology Markup', 20011218

From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider (pfps@research.bell-labs.com)
Date: 01/08/02

• Next message: Peter F. Patel-Schneider: "Re: draft RDF datatyping response"
• Previous message: Mike Dean: "Joint Committee telecon today 8 January"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

attached mail follows:

Hi,
reading [1] I found the following typos (IMHO):
Chap 4 (towards the end):
   "It perfectly admissible for a class"
      should state
   "It is perfectly admissible for a class"

Chap 5:
   "The former belong to daml:ObjectProperty and
    the latter belong to daml:DatatypeProperty."
      should state
   "The former belongs to daml:ObjectProperty and
    the latter belongs to daml:DatatypeProperty."


   "we might want to provide a shoesize property,
    which is provides at most a single shoe size"
      should state
   "we might want to provide a shoesize property,
    which provides at most a single shoe size"


Hope it helps
Enrico Spinielli

[1] 'Annotated DAML+OIL Ontology Markup' (W3C Note 18 December 2001)
    http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/NOTE-daml+oil-walkthru-20011218/

• Next message: Peter F. Patel-Schneider: "Re: draft RDF datatyping response"
• Previous message: Mike Dean: "Joint Committee telecon today 8 January"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : 04/02/02 EST