Re: thoughts on the new rdfs:subClassOf

From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider (pfps@research.bell-labs.com)
Date: 08/30/01

• Next message: Peter F. Patel-Schneider: "Re: subclass loops, proper subclasses and so on"
• Previous message: Frank van Harmelen: "Re: thoughts on the new rdfs:subClassOf"
• In reply to: pat hayes: "Re: thoughts on the new rdfs:subClassOf"
• Next in thread: Jim Hendler: "Re: thoughts on the new rdfs:subClassOf"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

From: pat hayes <phayes@ai.uwf.edu>
Subject: Re: thoughts on the new rdfs:subClassOf
Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2001 15:12:38 -0700

> >Here are some thoughts on rdfs:subClassOf.
> >
> >peter
> >
> >
> >	Notes on the new definition of rdfs:subClassOf
> >
> >The RDF Core working group has modified the definition of rdfs:subClassOf
> >to indicate that rdfs:subClassOf means proper subclass.  ....
> 
> NO, what I sent you was a DRAFT which has not been formally 
> considered by the WG yet, let alone approved by them. You saw it 
> first. The WG hasnt 'done' anything about this issue yet, so please 
> don't say that it has.

OK.  My lips are sealed.  :-)  Sorry for implying that this issue was
actually done.

peter

• Next message: Peter F. Patel-Schneider: "Re: subclass loops, proper subclasses and so on"
• Previous message: Frank van Harmelen: "Re: thoughts on the new rdfs:subClassOf"
• In reply to: pat hayes: "Re: thoughts on the new rdfs:subClassOf"
• Next in thread: Jim Hendler: "Re: thoughts on the new rdfs:subClassOf"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : 04/02/02 EST