From: Dan Connolly (connolly@w3.org)
Date: 10/09/01
Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote: > From: Pat Hayes <phayes@ai.uwf.edu> > Subject: Re: datatypes and RDF Schema > Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2001 18:57:09 -0500 > > >>BTW, re. your recent rants about communication. This issue is being >>discussed simultaneously both here and on RDF-core, and I'm sure it >>would be extremely useful if the discussions could be integrated. >> > > I do not believe that I can post to that mailing list. Can I? You're welcome to join the RDF Core WG and post to the list. I'm not sure what mechanisms/policies are in place in the case you try to post to the RDF Core list without joining the group. > One important forcing function, and one that appears to be getting > completely insufficient attention in the RDF Core WG, is > > What does XML/XML Schema do? XML doesn't 'do' anything relevant. Severl people in the WG are quite faimilar with XML Schema. It doesn't answer the question either. > PS: Does anyone know how to elevate this issue to joint RDF/XML/DAML+OIL > consideration? I don't know what that means. > Is the Semantic Web Coordination Group the right place? -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : 04/02/02 EST