Re: Fw: Re: DAML+OIL submission to W3C (copyright/patent)

From: Dan Connolly (connolly@w3.org)
Date: 10/18/01

Next message: Deborah McGuinness: "Re: Fw: Re: DAML+OIL submission to W3C (copyright/patent)"
Previous message: Dan Connolly: "Re: Fw: Re: DAML+OIL submission to W3C (copyright/patent)"
In reply to: Jim Hendler: "Re: Fw: Re: DAML+OIL submission to W3C (copyright/patent)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Jim Hendler wrote:
[...]
> [party} hereby grants to all organizations and entities a perpetual,
> royalty-free...  ?

it's a non-exclusive license. If you/we want to license it to
somebody else, you/we can do that too.

> i.e. let's just put the frigging thing in public domain -- can W3C handle that?

I'm not sure I could release my contribution to the public
domain; it's not my personal property; it belongs
to MIT (or maybe to DARPA; I'm not sure).

-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/

Next message: Deborah McGuinness: "Re: Fw: Re: DAML+OIL submission to W3C (copyright/patent)"
Previous message: Dan Connolly: "Re: Fw: Re: DAML+OIL submission to W3C (copyright/patent)"
In reply to: Jim Hendler: "Re: Fw: Re: DAML+OIL submission to W3C (copyright/patent)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : 04/02/02 EST