From: Frank van Harmelen (Frank.van.Harmelen@cs.vu.nl)
Date: 03/22/01
> pat hayes wrote: > [...] > > abstract class --> class (or --> DAML class , if the point needs > > emphasising) > > abstract object --> object > > abstract domain --> class domain (or --> DAML class domain) > > concrete class --> datatype (or --> xmls datatype) > > concrete object --> datatype value > > > > I could revise the documentation in the next day or 2 to reflect > > these changes (and remain grammatical) if people agree that it should > > be done. > > > > Comments?? Dan Connolly wrote: > > I agree this should be done. > > I'd like to hear from MikeD and Frank about what's > the most straightfoward way to do it; i.e. whether > we should take you up on the offer above. I also agree that this should be done. During last Tuesdays teleconf, I bowed out of updating the doc's. Peter, Pat and Lynn had offered to take over (and have been already working on it). Frank. ----
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : 04/02/02 EST