Re: comments on Reference description

From: Dan Connolly ([email protected])
Date: 03/21/01


pat hayes wrote:
[...]
> abstract class  --> class  (or -->  DAML class , if the point needs
> emphasising)
> abstract object --> object
> abstract domain  --> class domain  (or --> DAML class domain)
> concrete class --> datatype  (or --> xmls datatype)
> concrete object --> datatype value
> 
> I could revise the documentation in the next day or 2 to reflect
> these changes (and remain grammatical) if people agree that it should
> be done.
> 
> Comments??

I agree this should be done.

I'd like to hear from MikeD and Frank about what's
the most straightfoward way to do it; i.e. whether
we should take you up on the offer above.

-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
office: tel:+1-913-491-0501
pager: mailto:[email protected]
  (put return phone number in from/subject)


This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : 04/02/02 EST