From: Dan Connolly (connolly@w3.org)
Date: 03/21/01
pat hayes wrote: [...] > abstract class --> class (or --> DAML class , if the point needs > emphasising) > abstract object --> object > abstract domain --> class domain (or --> DAML class domain) > concrete class --> datatype (or --> xmls datatype) > concrete object --> datatype value > > I could revise the documentation in the next day or 2 to reflect > these changes (and remain grammatical) if people agree that it should > be done. > > Comments?? I agree this should be done. I'd like to hear from MikeD and Frank about what's the most straightfoward way to do it; i.e. whether we should take you up on the offer above. -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ office: tel:+1-913-491-0501 pager: mailto:connolly.pager@w3.org (put return phone number in from/subject)
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : 04/02/02 EST