Re: comments on Reference description

From: Dan Connolly (
Date: 03/21/01

pat hayes wrote:
> abstract class  --> class  (or -->  DAML class , if the point needs
> emphasising)
> abstract object --> object
> abstract domain  --> class domain  (or --> DAML class domain)
> concrete class --> datatype  (or --> xmls datatype)
> concrete object --> datatype value
> I could revise the documentation in the next day or 2 to reflect
> these changes (and remain grammatical) if people agree that it should
> be done.
> Comments??

I agree this should be done.

I'd like to hear from MikeD and Frank about what's
the most straightfoward way to do it; i.e. whether
we should take you up on the offer above.

Dan Connolly, W3C
office: tel:+1-913-491-0501
  (put return phone number in from/subject)

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : 04/02/02 EST