Re: equivalentTo

From: Ian Horrocks (horrocks@cs.man.ac.uk)
Date: 03/22/01

Next message: Peter F. Patel-Schneider: "Re: further de-abstraction details"
Previous message: Ian Horrocks: "Re: further de-abstraction details"
In reply to: pat hayes: "Re: equivalentTo"
Next in thread: pat hayes: "Re: equivalentTo"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

p.s. another point about sameClassAs and samePropertyAs is that they
can be subs of subClassOf and subPropertyOf respectively, so that part
of the meaning is captured in RDFS. We can't do this with the generic
equivalent due to range and domain restrictions on subClassOf and
subPropertyOf.

Ian

Next message: Peter F. Patel-Schneider: "Re: further de-abstraction details"
Previous message: Ian Horrocks: "Re: further de-abstraction details"
In reply to: pat hayes: "Re: equivalentTo"
Next in thread: pat hayes: "Re: equivalentTo"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : 04/02/02 EST