From: Graham Klyne (GK@ninebynine.org)
Date: 11/12/01
As one who relatively recently became aware of description logics, I found that a very useful, readable paper. Thanks for that. I think it deserves wider awareness outside this community. (It has seemed to me that relatively few of the papers that deal with description logics are available online. I have been unable to get hold of some that were suggested to me, such as past ICCS proceedings. Has anyone yet written a textbook on description logics?) #g -- At 09:08 AM 11/8/01 -0800, Deborah McGuinness wrote: >That was for a mostly less expressive language than daml+oil (although >interestingly >enough would have happily been able to say the thing that jeff wanted to >say since >it did have same-as as a constructor). > >[1] >http://www.ksl.stanford.edu/people/dlm/papers/living-with-classic-abstract.html ------------------------- __ /\ \ Graham Klyne / \ \ (GK@ACM.ORG) / /\ \ \ / / /\ \ \ / / /__\_\ \ / / /________\ \/___________/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : 04/02/02 EST