RE: deSkolemizing to get Horn-expressivity with RDF rules

From: Benjamin Grosof (bgrosof@mit.edu)
Date: 11/22/02

  • Next message: Benjamin Grosof: "Description Logic Programs working paper -- new version"
    Hi Murray,
    Amen.  I'm working on that, including with Sheila McIlraith and Dave Martin.
    Paper on SweetDeal system with rules+ont e-contracting scenario (ISWC Rules 
    workshop), and paper on ECOIN system with ont+rules financial analysis 
    scenario (WITS '02) are on my website.
    Best,
    Benjamin
    
    At 08:18 AM 11/22/2002 -0500, mburke wrote:
    >Please make sure that there  are adequate use cases, related to DAML-S
    >I believe DAML-Services has a critical need for the rule language.
    >
    >Thanks.
    >
    >Murray
    >
    >Murray A. Burke
    >Program Manager
    >DARPA/IXO
    >3701 N. Fairfax Drive           Phone: 703-696-2303
    >Arlington, VA 22203-1714        Fax:   517-218-4550
    >mailto: mburke@darpa.mil        DSN:        426-2303
    >
    >-----Original Message-----
    >From: Harold Boley [mailto:boley@informatik.uni-kl.de]
    >Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2002 10:16 PM
    >To: Sandro Hawke
    >Cc: joint-committee@daml.org
    >Subject: Re: deSkolemizing to get Horn-expressivity with RDF rules
    >
    >Hi Sandro,
    >
    > > > As I hinted at in a different thread, it should be helpful to exchange
    > > > our experience with rule engines such as cwm/n3 and Mandarax/RuleML or
    > > > j-DREW/RuleML.
    > >
    > > What would you suggest?   Our cwm/n3 work is all in a public cvs
    > > repository, but it hasn't been properly written up.  We're still
    > > trying to understand what aspects of it are novel and/or useful.   Do
    > > you have ideas for a process that might work here?
    >
    >We could jointly announce, on rdf-rules, to start an exchange of experience
    >about rule engines and tools between N3, RuleML, and related rule languages:
    >
    >. . .
    >
    >For this purpose we are collecting use cases beginning with three initial
    >examples. Further use-case proposals should be sent to rdf-rules.
    >
    >One example of these, GEDCOM, already happens to be in the N3 collection,
    >http://www.w3.org/2000/10/swap/Examples, as well as in the RuleML
    >collection,
    >http://www.ruleml.org/#Library. Further ones could also find their way into
    >these individual collections or, a common collection could be established.
    >
    >1. GEDCOM (Author: Mike Dean)
    >This has already been used to demonstrate aspects of N3 and RuleML.
    >
    >2. Authentication (Author: Tim Berners-Lee)
    >Versions of an authentication rule have been written in both N3 and RuleML;
    >these could be jointly extended.
    >
    >3. Open ...
    >
    >Our rule engines will be tried on these examples to compare and possibly
    >later align:
    >
    >* Expressiveness
    >  - Triples
    >  - Horn rules
    >  - Negation
    >  - Contexts/Modules
    >  - Other
    >
    >* Built-ins
    >  - Arithmetics
    >  - Sequences
    >  - Other
    >
    >* Basic bottom-up and top-down derivation, as well as combined techniques
    >   (e.g., cashing/tabeling)
    >  - Memory use
    >  - Response time
    >
    >* Rule interpretation
    >
    >* Rule compilation
    >  - SQL
    >  - Rete
    >  - WAM
    >
    >* Rule transformation
    >  - XSLT-based
    >  - Other
    >
    >* Rule development tools
    >  - Editors
    >  - Validators
    >  - Cross-referencers
    >
    >* Web-tool embedding
    >  - Client-side embedding
    >  - Server-side embedding
    >
    >* Conventional-software integration
    >  - Rule-engine API and programming-language interfaces
    >  - Database and data bindings
    
    Prof. Benjamin Grosof
    Web Technologies for E-Commerce, Business Policies, E-Contracting, Rules, 
    XML, Agents, Semantic Web Services
    MIT Sloan School of Management, Information Technology group
    http://ebusiness.mit.edu/bgrosof or http://www.mit.edu/~bgrosof
    


    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : 11/22/02 EST