RDF Concrete Syntax

From: Mike Dean (mdean@bbn.com)
Date: 11/12/03

Next message: Harold Boley: "Re: notes from 11/11/03 JC telecon on Rules and preparing W3 Note"

Previous message: Sandro Hawke: "W3C Namespace and Submission Details"
Next in thread: Mike Dean: "Re: RDF Concrete Syntax"
Maybe reply: Mike Dean: "Re: RDF Concrete Syntax"
Reply: Ian Horrocks: "Re: RDF Concrete Syntax"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

I created swrl.rdf [1] (dumpont [2]) using only RDF Schema
following the lead of WebOnt, but was a bit dissatisfied
with the clarity of the result, so I also created swrl.owl
[3] (dumpont [4]).  How concerned are folks with separating
the RDF encoding from OWL?

After we publish the rules proposal, we should develop a
corresponding swrl.xsd XML Schema for the XML Concrete
Syntax (importing the XML Schema(s) for the OWL XML
Presentation Syntax).

	Mike

[1] http://www.daml.org/rules/proposal/swrl.rdf

[2] http://www.daml.org/cgi-bin/dumpont?www.daml.org/rules/proposal/swrl.rdf

[3] http://www.daml.org/rules/proposal/swrl.owl

[4] http://www.daml.org/cgi-bin/dumpont?www.daml.org/rules/proposal/swrl.owl

Next message: Harold Boley: "Re: notes from 11/11/03 JC telecon on Rules and preparing W3 Note"
Previous message: Sandro Hawke: "W3C Namespace and Submission Details"
Next in thread: Mike Dean: "Re: RDF Concrete Syntax"
Maybe reply: Mike Dean: "Re: RDF Concrete Syntax"
Reply: Ian Horrocks: "Re: RDF Concrete Syntax"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : 11/12/03 EST