From: Pat Hayes (phayes@ai.uwf.edu)
Date: 12/07/01
>Pat Hayes wrote: >[...] >> >Er... it was your idea... >[...] >> >> OK, Touche. >> >> There are two rather different things that denying (p or not p) could >> mean. One (not so good) is to move from a 2-valued to a 3- or >> more-valued logic. The other (better) is to move to a constructive or >> intuitionistic logic. I should have checked which one you meant >> before reacting, sorry. > >Rather than an apology, >I'd prefer a clarification to joint-committee to say >that you don't think I'm completely off my rocker. Whoops, I thought I had Ccd it. Sor.....no, wrong strategy.... Pat hereby certifies that Dan Connolly is not completely off his rocker. Pat -- --------------------------------------------------------------------- IHMC (850)434 8903 home 40 South Alcaniz St. (850)202 4416 office Pensacola, FL 32501 (850)202 4440 fax phayes@ai.uwf.edu http://www.coginst.uwf.edu/~phayes
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : 04/02/02 EST