Re: Coordination with RDF Core

From: Dan Connolly (connolly@w3.org)
Date: 07/09/01

• Next message: Jim Hendler: "Re: equivalentTo / sameClassAs / sameIndividualAs puzzle"
• Previous message: Peter F. Patel-Schneider: "Re: Coordination with RDF Core"
• In reply to: pat hayes: "Re: Coordination with RDF Core"
• Next in thread: pat hayes: "Re: Coordination with RDF Core"
• Reply: pat hayes: "Re: Coordination with RDF Core"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

pat hayes wrote:
> 
[...]
> The coreWG has decided that RDF describes containers rather
> than, as it were, implementing them, so there is no way to say that
> an RDF container has a limited number of items.

Really? When/where? pointer?

> We should keep the
> point in the document, just a heads-up of what to expect.
> 

-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/

• Next message: Jim Hendler: "Re: equivalentTo / sameClassAs / sameIndividualAs puzzle"
• Previous message: Peter F. Patel-Schneider: "Re: Coordination with RDF Core"
• In reply to: pat hayes: "Re: Coordination with RDF Core"
• Next in thread: pat hayes: "Re: Coordination with RDF Core"
• Reply: pat hayes: "Re: Coordination with RDF Core"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : 04/02/02 EST