From: pat hayes ([email protected])
Date: 07/06/01
>Dear Joint Everybody,
>
>In the meeting of 26 June, we discussed Peter's initial list of
>coordination points between DAMl+OIL and the RDF Core activity (see [1])
>
>I volunteered to update his notes by taking into account our discussion,
>and also making it into a proper document.
>
>You can find the result at [2], and attached.
>I assume that if we agree on this, it should be passed on to the RDF
>Core folk?
>
>Frank.
> ----
>
>[1] http://www.daml.org/listarchive/joint-committee/0495.html
>[2] http://www.cs.vu.nl/~frankh/spool/RDFS-DAML+OIL-coordination.html
I would like to see the 'URI' point retained in the document. The
more the coreWG gets its node rubbed in this issue, the better :-)
BTW, I believe the 'closed containers' issue is a lost cause at this
stage. The coreWG has decided that RDF describes containers rather
than, as it were, implementing them, so there is no way to say that
an RDF container has a limited number of items. We should keep the
point in the document, just a heads-up of what to expect.
Pat
---------------------------------------------------------------------
IHMC (850)434 8903 home
40 South Alcaniz St. (850)202 4416 office
Pensacola, FL 32501 (850)202 4440 fax
[email protected]
http://www.coginst.uwf.edu/~phayes
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : 04/02/02 EST