From: Sandro Hawke (sandro@w3.org)
Date: 12/21/04
Speaking for SWRL-FOL, am I remembering correctly that it was decided to not even have a "broken" RDF version of the syntax? Is there some text which explains that decision to the community which was reported as happily implementing the broken one in SWRL 0.6? (Of course this connects to a discussion Peter and I are having on www-rdf-logic.) -- sandro
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : 12/21/04 EST