From: Dan Connolly (connolly@w3.org)
Date: 12/21/00
Ian Horrocks wrote: > > I thought we had agreed on daml+oil, not daml+ont. Oops... yes, we did; at least for the title: RESOLVED: "DAML+OIL: An Ontology Language for the Semantic Oil" for the title of the next release; clear acknowledgement of all contributors. -- http://www.daml.org/committee/minutes/2000-12-08-irc.txt (... Semantic Web is what we meant, I think ;-) > I has assumed the names would be: > > daml+oil.daml > daml+oil-ex.daml Fine by me. -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ office: tel:+1-913-491-0501 pager: mailto:connolly.pager@w3.org (put return phone number in from/subject)
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : 04/02/02 EST