From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider (pfps@research.bell-labs.com)
Date: 01/30/01
I'll have lots more comments on Jeff's proposal later, but I have one simple comment for now. From: Jeff Heflin <heflin@cs.umd.edu> Subject: Suggested changes to concrete datatypes proposal Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 17:26:31 -0500 > 9) change the type of daml:onProperty to daml:UniqueProperty (so that a > daml:Restriction can have at most one daml:onProperty, disallowing the > odd semantics that occur when someone tries to define multiple > restrictions within a single <Restriction> element). This will not disallow Restrictions with multiple ``restrictions'', as it is possible to have both a hasClass and a has Value in one Restriction. peter
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : 04/02/02 EST