Re: Fw: Re: DAML+OIL submission to W3C (copyright/patent)

From: Dan Connolly (connolly@w3.org)
Date: 10/20/01

Next message: Joseph Coffman: "on behalf of Jim Hendler"
Previous message: Peter F. Patel-Schneider: "Re: Fw: Re: DAML+OIL submission to W3C (copyright/patent)"
In reply to: Peter F. Patel-Schneider: "Re: Fw: Re: DAML+OIL submission to W3C (copyright/patent)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

"Peter F. Patel-Schneider" wrote:
> 
[...]
>  My avenue of approach is going to have to be that I will get
> some wording from Lucent lawyers and attach that to the submission.  If
> this causes problems, then so be it.

Yes, such is life.

Here's hoping for the best...

-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/

Next message: Joseph Coffman: "on behalf of Jim Hendler"
Previous message: Peter F. Patel-Schneider: "Re: Fw: Re: DAML+OIL submission to W3C (copyright/patent)"
In reply to: Peter F. Patel-Schneider: "Re: Fw: Re: DAML+OIL submission to W3C (copyright/patent)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : 04/02/02 EST