Re: Updated: CONCRETE SYNTAX FOR RULES LITE

From: Mike Dean (mdean@bbn.com)
Date: 09/16/03

Next message: Mike Dean: "Re: Updated: CONCRETE SYNTAX FOR RULES LITE"

Previous message: Mike Dean: "Re: Updated: CONCRETE SYNTAX FOR RULES LITE"
Maybe in reply to: Harold Boley: "Updated: CONCRETE SYNTAX FOR RULES LITE"
Next in thread: Mike Dean: "Re: Updated: CONCRETE SYNTAX FOR RULES LITE"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

> I'll volunteer to contribute the examples.

I created an OWL ontology [1] and instances [2] based on the
facts in [3].

	Mike

[1] http://www.daml.org/2003/06/ruletests/ocean-ont

[2] http://www.daml.org/2003/06/ruletests/oceans

[3] http://www.daml.org/listarchive/joint-committee/1451.html

Next message: Mike Dean: "Re: Updated: CONCRETE SYNTAX FOR RULES LITE"
Previous message: Mike Dean: "Re: Updated: CONCRETE SYNTAX FOR RULES LITE"
Maybe in reply to: Harold Boley: "Updated: CONCRETE SYNTAX FOR RULES LITE"
Next in thread: Mike Dean: "Re: Updated: CONCRETE SYNTAX FOR RULES LITE"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : 09/16/03 EST