From: Dan Connolly (connolly@w3.org)
Date: 12/20/00
Mike Dean wrote: > > Let's plan to use entries under > > http://www.daml.org/2000/12/ > > with > > daml+ont.daml for the namespace Please don't include the extension in the namespace name. Just use: http://www.daml.org/2000/12/daml+ont# As to why, see http://www.w3.org/Provider/Style/URI Other than that, I agree. > daml+ont-index.html for a dispatch page (HTML references > to the release should generally point here) > > daml-ex.daml, etc. > > This approach has the following advantages > > short URI for namespace > > keeps all files together > > consistency with the daml-ont release > > avoids the content negotiation problem with daml-ont.daml > that I introduced by using daml-ont.html as the dispatch > page yup. > allows for the possibility of other files also being under > 2000/12/ > > Thanks! > > Mike -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ office: tel:+1-913-491-0501 pager: mailto:connolly.pager@w3.org (put return phone number in from/subject)
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : 04/02/02 EST