Re: SWRL levels

From: Frank van Harmelen (Frank.van.Harmelen@cs.vu.nl)
Date: 11/17/05

Next message: ref-kko@hyu.com: "$B@$$NCf%[%9%H%V!<%`!)(B"

Previous message: miyashita: "$BFCJLM%BT$40FFb!*Js=7#2#5K|!yI,FI!y(B"
In reply to: Mike Dean: "RE: SWRL levels"
Next in thread: Sandro Hawke: "Re: SWRL levels"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Mike Dean wrote:
> My primary intent was to show that the constructs of SWRL could be applied
> at each level of the current Semantic Web stack, rather than to introduce
> additional stratification.  A number of people currently dismiss SWRL out of
> hand because the current specification includes OWL.

Ah, I see.
Indeed, that makes a lot of sense (both technically and PR-wise).
Sorry for missing your point in the first instance.

Frank.
   --

Next message: ref-kko@hyu.com: "$B@$$NCf%[%9%H%V!<%`!)(B"
Previous message: miyashita: "$BFCJLM%BT$40FFb!*Js=7#2#5K|!yI,FI!y(B"
In reply to: Mike Dean: "RE: SWRL levels"
Next in thread: Sandro Hawke: "Re: SWRL levels"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : 11/17/05 EST